Always playing the contrarian aren't you? I never said it was a perfect analogy and the concerns aren't totally the same -- just that people had injury concerns about a young Blake Griffin and the way he played the game and that his career has been very good/productive. If Zion's career ends up going the same way as Blake's then I'm sure most people in NO will be very happy and take it. He's already a better outside shooter than young Blake. It's not a perfect analogy because no one in the NBA has been this large and this explosive an athlete... He's closer to an NFL player than an NBA player. Still, people have compared Zion Williamson to Blake Griffin, like Max Kellerman. A reasonable person would sign Zion up for Blake's career, but it doesn't make it less odd to say 'Zion may have injury concerns, but they did about Blake too' when those injury concerns ended up being very real. It's a bit of a "they very much did kill Jesus" sorta comparison. I don't think those injury concerns ended up being "very real" in Blake Griffin's case. Some of his injuries were weird incidents like a staph infection in his right elbow and breaking his hand hitting a member of the team's equipment staff lol. Not all his injuries are related to his play and the early concerns about physical contact trying to dunk on everyone... I think Blake Griffin has been unlucky (in regards to some injuries), but early in his career he was very productive and durable before his body started breaking down. Edit: Another weird fluke injury I found in an article about his injuries: Even the first injury he suffered was from a stress fracture in his left kneecap that wasn't that serious. That's not as bad as tearing your meniscus or ACL/MCL. He was only suppose to miss a few weeks. The reason he missed the rest of the season was because it wasn't healing properly (which does occasionally happen with stress fractures). Again, somewhat fluky in nature.