why is rose barely getting any criticism from the media? he's been flat out bad in the postseaosn, but they still keep pimping him hard. if lebron/kobe/dirk was playing like rose is playing, they'd be getting CRUSHED by everybody. but with rose, it's just "the MVP is so explosive and so amazing at finishing at the rim!" when he's going like 9-29 and [expletive]. it's get of annoying. maybe some constructive criticism would help. the main headline on espn.com right now is a perfect example. they "somewhat" contained him? he was 12-32. he was awful. i think people look at his 34 points and just say "damn, rose dropped 34 again", when reality it should be "damn, rose shot well under 40% again". rose is having an awful postseason. AND WE HAVEN'T EVEN PLAYED A GOOD TEAM YET