Jump to content
North Side Baseball

javy knows my name

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    10,564
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by javy knows my name

  1. It's said "Go Cubs" the entire winter. Part of the "Wrigley" might be newly effed up, though
  2. The editing category is a sham this year as neither that nor Coen bros (Roderick Jaynes) are nominated. But you're right about Inception, it has no chance whatsoever. The only ones that have a chance are Social Network and The King's Speech
  3. This is a good point. Stanzi could very well be taken in the middle of the second round and be the 6th-7th QB taken pretty easily. This is a very deep QB draft and quite a few teams have a good chance of taking a QB. I figured the very fact that this draft was deep in QBs meant that Stanzi would go lower than usual
  4. Yeah, me either. I don't get the hype he's getting nationally. Guys must have short memories, because while is TD/INT ratio was pretty elite last year, he's one year removed from like a 20-pick season. What is this hype he's getting? Being a projected 3rd-5th round pick is hype? And do you really think that they have short memories OR that they are impressed with the improvement he made in that area? He has ideal size with good mobility, came from a pro style offense, a decent arm, good makeup and had great production his senior year. I'm not sure what else you expect from a second or third-tier QB in the draft. I guess I didn't even see him as that. I think those who are unwilling to consider than his INSANE improvement in TD/INT might be a fluke are overrating the [expletive] out of him. He also had pretty excellent receivers to throw to in a run-first offense. I hope he does well, but I think his reasonable projection lies pretty much dead center between '09 and '10
  5. So even if Otto is subsequently let go you still won't listen? Wow, that's a lot of angst over a radio color man decision. Ron Santo being there was enough for me to not listen to Cubs games on WGN. Your brain is weird. He has literally never had an opinion I agree with
  6. Yeah, me either. I don't get the hype he's getting nationally. Guys must have short memories, because while is TD/INT ratio was pretty elite last year, he's one year removed from like a 20-pick season.
  7. Including those (obviously), I've got Inception as the 5th best movie on the list
  8. Ditto. I was told that was "embarrassing". what what
  9. I've only seen 3. I've seen all but three, and I'm still planning on seeing the Fighter. The King's Speech should win. Social Network will win.
  10. Can anyone think of a precedent in baseball for a trade like that? Granted you'd have to sign him to an extension a la Santana, but it's [expletive] Pujols. Don't say Babe to the Sox
  11. I can't believe I'm watching a Grand Slam final without either Federer or Nadal
  12. I DVRed the Senior Bowl on a whim. Is it at all worth watching?
  13. Huge win for Marquette. Seems we can only hold on at home, but I'll take it going to Nova next where they'll probably wipe the floor with us
  14. Old Style just shot a puppy
  15. Jay Crowder is legit. Solid outside shooter, big body and good slasher. Not too shabby on D, either.
  16. that he had 2 accounts And was using the alternate one to prop himself up in multiple threads
  17. And belong there you do
  18. I'm hosting a Puppy Bowl party in an act of solidarity
  19. That never stops being incredible to me
  20. 1) SSR's posts in this thread are great, and 2) Shut up, Illiniguy
  21. ...which is a made-up award anyway
  22. I've been waiting for someone to do this. Maybe the "but Hendry made the playoffs a few times this decade and the Cubs NEVER do that" crowd will finally shut the [expletive] up
  23. Eeeeeeveryone thinks they're sooooo superior to the Puppy Bowl until they actually watch it. It's amazing
  24. While I was reading that, I was thinking that the Cubs did indeed put themselves in an ideal position to acquire Pujols for 2012 and beyond when they inked Pena's one-year contract. But now I'm thinking that they may just be posturing in order to drive Pujols' price up for the Cards, when they really have no intention of signing such a contract. Then, before the ink is even dry on his ten-year, $270m deal, Hendry is going to leak a birth certificate proving Pujols' real age, 38.
  25. So now we have reached the point on this board that when someone doesn't agree with your point it is now free game to call them "meatballs" or some other insult? Now? That point was reached long ago. This place would be great with some effective moderators that weren't afraid to put the handful of 10,000+ post bullies in their place. This place would absolutely go to hell if people weren't allowed to put the "Aramis should bunt so the [expletive] players feel better about themselves" crowd in their place Using insults and personal attacks? Wrong. Feel free to disagree, respectfully. (BTW if you walked away thinking I want Ramirez bunting, you failed to grasp my point despite me repeating it about a dozen times.) Oh no, I got it. You want him to practice doing something you never, ever want him to do in a game. That makes way more sense
×
×
  • Create New...