Yea there is definitely some trend that way. Vegas went with 65,000. But yea the basic idea is that those extra seats are the most expensive to build and generate the least revenue. Still, even with that slight downward trend, didn't expect a team to go all the way down to 60k I wonder if there is some site constraint, ie to make the stadium bigger seat wise would mean more land acquisition, etc I think cost was the main reason they didn't go bigger. It's a fairly taxpayer friendly deal that was agreed upon.