Jump to content
North Side Baseball

WrigleyField 22

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    19,041
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by WrigleyField 22

  1. Yea their extremely well positioned if they feel like going off on a run, but even discussing it is false hope and I won't allow myself to dwell on it too long. I'd really just prefer an embarrassing loss this week so I can focus on tanking rather than actually root for the playoffs only to finish 8-8 again. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  2. Can you imagine going 5-11 and still having a chance to host a playoff game? LOL. Rooting for it to happen will be the highlight of the rest of my NFL season. Unfortunately it's so convoluted it has no chance. However a losing record from that division actually does have a shot so that's what I'm cheering for, along with at least one 10 win team from the AFC missing, preferably Ravens or Browns so I can laugh at my friends' misery. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  3. Technically not last-last place, but tied for last in his division and bottom three (bottom three in points as well) Roster before his trade: Peyton Manning Ben Tate Ronnie Hillman Randall Cobb Percy Harvin Eric Decker Owen Daniels Dan Bailey Seahawks D/ST D/ST Reggie Bush Andre Johnson Shane Vereen Darren McFadden Jerick McKinnon Ray Rice (presumably he was holding him as a potential keeper? finally dropped him) Montee Ball Brian Quick(IR) This guys also won the league last year when he beat me in the Championship game, and we still had a winner-take-all pool.
  4. Hey, I think that's me!
  5. And the Falcons win out and end up with a SB and less wins than 10 AFC teams.
  6. A playoff scenario with a 5-11 Atlanta making the playoffs :) please happen https://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/playoffscenario?algorithm=custom&11=D4110405&12=55050055&13=11054511&14=01450055&15=44155005&16=10114410 And the most bizarre scenario I could come up with, with two 9-7 wild cards in the NFC and the first 4 out in the AFC being ten win teams (3 of 4 from the AFC North) https://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/playoffscenario?algorithm=custom&11=D4110405&12=45150041&13=05054105&14=10450055&15=45551011&16=10114410 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  7. Terrance Williams @ NYG or Joquie Bell @ NE. I also have Alfred Blue as a possibility v Cin if Arian Foster can't go again. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  8. Tough one. I think I play the matchup vs D and go Romo Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  9. The idiot in my league who traded Manning(out of keeper options) and Hillman to the top guy in our league. In return he got a $7 Russell Wilson and $25 CJ Spiller. Neither are likely to be anything but fair market keepers at best. While it was totally obvious for this guy to trade Manning since he was in last place and no longer had keeper rights he sold him to basically the first bidder with no real rush and this guy has been head and shoulders above the competition all year already. Granted Manning just laid an egg this week, but it should give him a boost going forward into the playoffs. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  10. The Blackhawks had some great teams in the first half of the 90's. I was born 88, so early 90s was even a little early for myself. Someone born a few years earlier would then have had the benefit of a good team during those initial sports fan years. Hockey also has to have benefited from HD more than any other sport, no? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  11. Someone growing up in the 90s like myself is a good example of Chicago sports fandom : NBA- Bulls were awesome NFL - Bears sucked MLB - Cubs sucked NHL - Hawks sucked and were blacked out. I'm a bandwagon Hawks fan. Borderline Bulls bandwagon fan, but they did also happen to just be awesome when first exposed. Not bandwagon for Bears or Cubs. I'm a little bit fair weather on all but the Bears though. Probably more sensitive to the Cubs though than Bulls. Hawks tbd. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  12. Bandwagon fans are just the likely precursor to fair weather fans. They jump on when a team gets good. If their loyalty wanes when the team is bad and picks up again with success, they make the transition to fair weather. If you become a fan when the team is bad you aren't a bandwagon fan. Though if doesn't exclude you from becoming fair weather later on. Simply, bandwagon describes the circumstances under which you became a fan and fair weather is based on cyclical nature of how you follow them. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  13. Nor is quantifying runs as cut and dried defensively as it is offensively. I've wondered how much run saving defense is dependent on chances. Like, is the ball distributed enough across the diamond that each position is going to have roughly the same chances or can you randomly "save" a bunch more runs one year just because 40 more balls got hit your way than the previous year? Whereas with hitting you're guaranteed to get a chance 11% of the time. Basically can good defense be mitigated just because the ball is hit to you less based on randomness... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  14. Give Fuller a shot 1:1 vs one and give plenty of help over the top to Jennings with the other? Not sure which way you go with it though. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  15. So possibly they bought at the height of the market at about $9M a piece and then sunk 8 digits into tear down/rebuild on each (is that a reasonable figure?) in 2008 plus upgrades and then increasing interest and late fees for the past 1-2 years? Lol. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  16. volatile real estate market and the difference in upgrades to the buildings, plus the potential that other properties not related to Wrigley Field are involved? Those are all obvious reasons that still seem like a stretch to account for $12M difference per building (a 200% markup). Height of the market in 2008 until now might make for what 50% difference generously if all else was the same? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  17. Ouch. 36M? How is that possible when the Cubs are buying two other rooftop buildings for a combined $12M? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  18. I don't get what that means. It would seemingly be very easy to be a fair weather Bears fans. I think he means, that how is he still a fan if he's just fairweather? The Bears have had more bad seasons than they've had good seasons. AKA where is the "fair" weather part that makes him a fan to begin with. They haven't had many great seasons, but they've won more than most over the past decade. They've been in a Super Bowl, another conference championship and despite only one other playoff appearance, they were in playoff contention very late almost every season. They haven't finished more than 1 game under .500 since 2004. That seems like an opportunity to have lots of fans get excited about things looking good and then abandoning them at their worst. Yea. This isn't the 90s Bears... where my fandom really grew (ditto the Cubs!- what is wrong with me?) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  19. Jay gets hurt next week vs TB. Things look dismal for Turkey day until Shea McClellin breaks Staffords collarbone. A simplified offense under Claussen puts up 31 and Bears pull off the divisional upset on the road. A 6-6 Bears look ahead to a 3-1 home/road schedule with only one seemingly tough game and a fresh QB controversy. My brother and I argue all Thanksgiving night whether Trestmans offense is "more suited" to Claussen. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  20. Ha, playing with this Yahoo generator it isn't even hard to put a scenario that gets a 10 loss team from the NFC South in. What a horrid division. Take Winning% as the baseline. Change NO loses to Chi in Chi (cold weather and all). Then an upset of either Atl or Car @ NO puts a 10 loss team winning the division. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  21. The way things are going, I think 8-7 will have you eliminated before week 17. Fate will find a way. Or if not, we'll also beat Dal and finish 9-7 after our crapping bed performance against Minn. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  22. It's gonna suck when we finish 8-8 and a 17th pick after beating Det twice and having a deciding week 17 game vs Min where we just crap the bed on 3 Cutler fumbles. GB wins the Super Bowl. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  23. Yea every team has fair weather fans and any fan who tries to tell you otherwise (Cardinals) is ignorant or lying. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  24. Whelp, they can have him at that price. Tired of this refrain. Kyle is going to have a field day with this Meh. I don't really like Martin all that much. I just don't want to get nothing. If this happens and we miss on Lester, then I'll go into meltdown mode. For now, I'll put it on standby. I agree with Kyle. :-( Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  25. Whelp, they can have him at that price. Tired of this refrain. You are upset the Cubs didn't beat 5yr/$80mil? Basically if it's just an extra year at the same rate we were discussing for a four year deal I'd be a little annoyed, but it really comes down to what else they do. If we have a clean sweep of missing FA over a bunch of extra one years or minimal cost/year figures I'll be definitely disappointed. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
×
×
  • Create New...