I don't see how his play as an 18 yr old at Eugene doesn't project to higher levels. He's not physically developed yet and the Cubs are OK with him taking his lumps in high A. I think this says a lot about his mental toughness. If you don't like young developing players that are over matched against older developing players, then you don't like Hoerner either. I think he had a sub .600 .OPS as a freshman, and that was with an aluminum bat. The pro survival rate if our only data point is a .600 OPS as a college freshman is extremely low. Thankfully we have more information since then. Similarly, the survival rate of guys who put up a .620 OPS in their first 400+ PA in full-season ball is not high. Ademan does have that success in his 40 game Eugene stint, and scouts seem to think he's a decent prospect so I don't want to come across as if I think he's hopeless. But you don't translate youth by saying a .600 OPS at age X is equivalent to an .800 OPS at age X+2. Ademan's performance in full-season ball has been very discouraging, he isn't hitting even for mediocre average or power, and his K rate is pushing 25%. His age and the lower threshold of his position gives him opportunity to rebound, but there's nothing about that we can look at and think it portends well if he only were a few months older at this level.