Wilson and Walker's strengths are not readily visible when you watch games. They take walks, work the count, and hit for some extra bases. They don't have great speed or bodybuilder physiques, they just hit and walk and sometimes(more often in Wilson's case), strike out. To the common fan(and maybe some front office people, I don't know), those qualities aren't seen as being as valuable as they are, and certainly not as "sexy" as being a 30-30 guy or something. Add in the fact that neither are stellar defensively(Wilson especially), and it adds up to them being valued for less than what they are. Regarding Walker's defense and the 2003 season. Any reputation he got was far from undeserved after '03. He was AWFUL defensively in '03, an 84 Rate is just obscenely bad. However, another thing the common fan(and maybe some front office people, I don't know) doesn't recognize or acknowledge is that defense is not a static ability. Common perception of Pat Burrell is that he had a great start to his career(offensively speaking), then had a down year, but was able to bounce back. The same way with Walker. He had a down defensive year in '03, but bounced back to previous levels(which is a below average defender). However, due to public perception as fielding being a static ability, and the fact that Walker's norms were far from gold glove caliber, he has a bit of an unfair stigma as a very poor defender.