Healthy arm...right age, not a FA until 2020...TOR playoff experience at young ages...all his pitches either generate one or more of popups, whiffs, or groundballs...throws strikes...logs innings...his sinker and slider are elite pitches and none of the 5-6 pitches he throws sucks...groundball machine with power stuff...Extremely marketable player...He basically seems to me to be exactly the right pitcher at exactly the right time, both for him and the Cubs. I've said I would do something crazy like drink a large blackberry and mint chip milkshake with 2% for the Cubs to land Stroman and absolutely mean it. Stroman's about as perfect a fit as could be imagined for the Cubs, and vice versa (as you stated). The Cubs need a pitcher this year, that's essentially....much better than Lackey for the stretch run where they need to makeup some games. The Cubs need a pitcher next year to slot high in the rotation after Lester and Hendricks. The Cubs need a pitcher long-term for the TOR that won't be in his mid-to-late 30s and soon to be overpaid. To get all those things in 1 pitcher doesn't get any more ideal. The Cubs could go get a Gausman or Hahn, but who knows how good or healthy they would be down the stretch or where they project to slot in future rotations. And either of these guys would still probably force the Cubs hand in spending on a FA SP again this offseason. The Cubs could go get Verlander, but he'll also be in his mid-to-late 30s and getting paid a ton of money until he retires. And he would still not end (not that it ever really does end) their pursuit for young controllable pitching. Stroman and Archer are the only names that could possibly be out there that check all the boxes. Easily better than Lackey now and potentially part of a playoff rotation. Strong 2nd or really good 3rd starter in 2018. Long-term #1 or #2 starter once Lester starts looking like 2017 Lackey. I love Eloy as a prospect, and those are the only 2 guys I'd give him up for. Stroman to me, is even a better bet than Archer long-term.