Mark this post down for best crow-eating candidate of the year so far. Where did Hendry say he was benching Murton for Floyd? If someone mused in an article that the Cubs weren't going to resign Aramis, would you believe him, too? Oh wait, that already happened on this board. Never mind. Bad example. If some guy writes an article in which he thinks the Cubs will let Zambrano walk, would you mark it down as a done deal and bash Hendry for it before it actually happened? Oy... Yes, you're right. Hendry is the guy who forced Todd Walker and Nomar Garciaparra to get injured so that Neifi Perez and Tony Womack could get all those at bats because he loves those guys soooooo much. And it was really the leprechaun that hides under Hendry's desk who pulled off the deals for Lee, Ramirez, Garciaparra and Murton without giving up much of anything. Those were just classic leprechaun-under-Jim-Hendry's-desk moves, weren't they. If we could get that leprechaun to be the Cubs GM... You're not going to convince me Hendry is a good GM, because he isn't. The Cubs record has gotten worse every year he's been here, and had he not gotten an extra 20 million to spend this offseason, the team would be just as bad off or worse off than we were at the start of last year. His baseball philosophy is wrong. He doesn't understand the importance of OBP and patience at the plate. Now, it may be that it was really Dusty and not Jim that decided to go with Hollandsworth over Dubois, Bynum over Theriot, Perez over Todd Walker (who should have played every day). Piniella may actually use a very different philosophy and play Murton over Floyd. If so, I'm wrong and I'll be glad that I was. But, given their track record, I'm not holding my breath. It does seem odd that a bench player gets a vesting option based on PAs. Why bother with being accurate when we can just make crap up?