I’m surprised at the miserable tone in this thread… You guys are usually better than that here. For Sanchez, the Cubs got out bid- so what?... Were they suppose to top 5/$80M? That would have been nuts. IMO, I’m glad he didn’t sign the Cubs offer. Did y’all really want him on the books in 2016 & 2017 for $$16M per?--- awful. I really like these one & two year deals at this point…If a player flops, so what; if a player excels, then you have an asset- nice! On the miserable mojo by a lot of the posters here- myopic much?!?… For last year, it was what it was, 2012 was going to be a mess regardless. What did it matter if the Cubs lost 91 games or 101 game- same difference. The Cubs traded some middling assets for youth, gave every prospect even close to the show a shot & added a bunch of talent to the system- good year. For this year, does any reasonable Cub fan want the Cubs in bidding wars with the Dodgers & Angels right now? If the Cubs lose 84 or 94 games this year, what's the difference?!? To varying degrees, the Cubs established 3 young core players in 2012, Rizzo, Shark & Castillo. If the Cubs can add 3 or more young core players to the team this year & add as much talent to the farm system as last year, that would be an excellent year. This would set the Cubs up to be playoff contenders in 2014 & they’d be setup for a long term run. Enjoy the process!