Expanding on what I posted... I think Matt Garza will improve marginally in the NL. His peripherals the past three years seem to suggest he'll be reasonably good, but that's about the extent of it. He's not an ace. With some luck, he could produce somewhere along the lines of a Ryan Dempster or a Ted Lilly. Overall, I can't complain about him in a vacuum. Starting at the low end of the deal, Fuld and Chirinos are essentially throw-ins. We all know about Fuld. Chirinos is old for a catcher, good character guy, and maybe will be a good backup in the majors. I don't see Chirinos hitting in the majors like he did this past season. No hard loss. Guyer's one of those intriguing guys who might have some decent upside left in him. He's a tweener and probably a 4th OF if he doesn't continue to develop power. Still, he could be a useful role player. I'm unsurprised the Cubs had to give up value. Hak-Ju Lee is probably on the low end of the top prospects in the Cubs' system. He spent the whole season in Low A, hasn't shown a lick of usable power, and and still has work left to do. Still, his upside is incredibly tantalizing. Losing him hurts. If the Cubs gave up Lee and a comparable B-/B prospect, I'd be okay. But Archer? Egh. He's got Marmol-level stuff and could stick as a starter. Even if he doesn't, he could have tremendous value in relief. His control issues are well-known, but there's a reason he was the #1 prospect in the Cubs' system. There's enough of a chance that his production could meet Garza's over the next five years that I'm not happy with the Cubs giving Archer up in addition to this package. I don't know a whole lot about Perez other than he's a speedster who was injured. We'll see about the PTBNL. So, in short, considering there's a reasonable enough chance that this package of prospects outperforms Garza + prospects over the next five years...I'm not too happy.