Haha, yeah...I'm not disinterested in 85 because of 69...I'm disinterested in 85 because it's talked about so damn much. And also, I have much more attachment to teams I was invested in, and at 9 years old, I just wasn't that invested in the Bears. I thought it was one of the weaker type 30 for 30's, mainly because they let the players basically take over it, but they don't have much of anything to say. They think they're a bunch of scary, insane guys with CA-RAZY stories who are actually just really, really boring. It touched on a lot of interesting things (how dominating the defense was, the mix of personalities, basically ushering in modern day media endorsements, the after effects of football), but it was on the level of the 30 for 30's that were basically made by the major sports organizations in that it was too focused on making it a love letter to the subject. The second half was better, if not depressing as hell. Seeing the different reactions to Payton's frustration over not scoring in the SB was interesting (but then when they have an opportunity to do something similar with Ditka going media crazy when he told everyone else not to and how it pissed a lot of them off, that's only briefly touched on and mostly played for a joke), as was McMahon dealing with his injuries. As usual Sammy, you're talking out of both sides of your mouth. Or maybe another orifice. You thought it was 'weak' and then cite points you thought were interesting. And you must have stayed with it for the whole two hours because you could easily switched channels. I thought it captured the attitude of the team and how they were built. They didn't gloss over the Ditka/Ryan relationship. If it was a Bears mgmt. production, you would not have heard about McCaskey criticism. Even though it happened 30 years ago, there has not been a team that reached such national attention since, even though teams have had more sustained success.