I like Detroit and I'm one of the ones that likes the move. I don't think I'm fawning, but Detroit is a team that's had specific needs the past 5 off-seasons and they have addressed them. Maybe not perfectly, but they have addressed them. When I see the Tigers' moves the past 5 years I see - bringing in a big name to show they are players in the free agent market (Pudge), bring in an impact bat (Maggs) draft almost MLB ready pitchers and pay them ML contracts (Verlander, Miller, and the new guy that was going to N.C.) addressing OBP (Shef), getting a shortstop so they could move Guillen to 1B (Edgar). They have been criticized for nearly every one of these moves, yet they've gone from the worst team in the majors to one of the best in the past 5 years. Maggs, Pudge, Shef, and now Edgar all have some serious negatives and all cost a lot in the way of money and or prospects, but at least I see a team that targets specific problems and tries to fix them instead of what I see in the Cubs sometimes- getting redundant players and overpaying for no names. Anyway, not trying to argue to just argue, but I like the move.