Jump to content
North Side Baseball

jumbo

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,123

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by jumbo

  1. jumbo
    I have to admit, I'm fairly excited about this guy coming to the Cubs. I'm not sure if he's some massive improvement over the previous MLPC, but I like reading his comments. Seems like a bright guy
  2. jumbo
    Evidently you can waive them. But it'd be a thing where the player knows where he's going to be playing from the get-go. They just get their money from a different team. I guess you'd kind of have to recruit a small market team early in the offseason and come up with some parameters up front. "We'll send you 10 mill for whatever and you give us this prospect". Then let that team make it work from there. But the player knows up front that this is how it's going to go down. So why not just pay for the prospect and let them sign the player? If I'm understanding the theory, it would allow a team like the Cubs to use their cash to get prospects outside of the amateur spending limits of the new CBA
  3. jumbo
    http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/mike-newman-prospects-chat-101812/ 4:32 Comment From bob How far away is Baez, and what do the Cubs do with him position-wise? 4:35 Mike Newman: Had a contact tell me Baez was much better at SS than he was expecting and may receive every opportunity to stick there which was surprising. I'm hoping to see him late next season when he reaches Tennessee. ------------ 4:42 Comment From Cubs Fan Any news on Arodys Vizcaino? After his injury does he still profile as a SP? 4:42 Mike Newman: I don't think so. He should be their closer before too long. Remember, he had been moved to the pen while he was with Atlanta. ------------- 4:42 Comment From jeff in no particular order, what are some of YOUR top prospects heading into next season? 4:44 Mike Newman: I can name a few I'm looking forward to seeing.... Dahl, Nimmo, Soler (maybe), Puig, Heredia (PIT). My only real disappointment is that Lexington is now a Royals affiliate. I might have lost my 2013 shot at Correa. ------------- 5:28 Comment From Chris Any thoughts on Christian Villanueva? I have seen a couple write-ups mention he may be more valuable at 2B than at 3B. 5:28 Mike Newman: Those were probably my write ups.
  4. jumbo
    Just want to say I love reading your posts on rankings. Even though this wasn't a polished/final list to you it's articulate and well done. Thanks
  5. jumbo
    [expletive] Rangers
  6. jumbo
    Went and looked up the probable pitchers and Cubs have Berken, Volstat, and Wood. I think we'll be fine
  7. jumbo
    I think Garza's situation is one that the players union didn't think through completely. Cubs could see how he pitches and if they're not able to get a great package for him, make him the 1 year qualifying offer if he won't take an extension this year. Then repeat until he's traded, signed away for a 1st round pick, or proves ineffective. It's not the most cost efficient way to have a SP, but there's no commitment.
  8. jumbo
    Get outta here with that reasonably level headed chatter. It's a good point on the compensation issue as far as Type A/B Free Agents that was still in place last year. It seems like only a handful of players will receive the qualifying offer, and non of these will be a target for the Cubs due to the draft pick compensation. This will be the first off-season of the new CBA, so maybe we'll see a slightly different FA approach. I don't think we'll be in on the top names, but they can't use arbitration as an excuse. Should be interesting. Beyond that, the Theo plan requires a ton of patience. Sometimes time doesn't go fast enough and we want to see what's going to happen in the future right now.
  9. jumbo
    Must...resist...urge...to...predict...every...affiliates...roster...
  10. jumbo
    I have Todd Frazier on my fantasy team, so I got to read this Dusty quote about what happens when Votto comes back: "Sometimes, you've got to wait your turn. I'm not pushing Scottie (Rolen) out the door at all. The world's in front of Frazier. Without the Fraziers and these guys, you can't win." So he wants to sit Frazier so Rolen can play, but then to say that you can't win without the Frazier's of the world - I don't miss that guy a bit.
  11. jumbo
    I don't personally think much of Valbuena as a starter. The handling of Vitters is questionable to me. I realize he is not looking good, but there's not much reason to not play him since he's up. Valbuena has had plenty of PT and he's been only slightly better than his career averages and at best not much more than a 1 WAR player. If he's a utility infielder that's great. But why not play Vitters now? On the radio today, Sveum was talking about how it matters to field the most competitive team possible in order to win games and honor the teams in the playoff run. But hey, don't tell the Astro's. Anyway, I think it's pointless to sit Vitters now.
  12. jumbo
    I'm just completely missing something here. Isn't pretty much every player on that list better, both recently and historically, than Ian Stewart? Why would you want Stewart over any of them, let alone all of them? Rolen is 37 Reynolds has a career strikeout rate of 33% Youkilis is 33 Chavez is 34 and hasn't put up an Ian Stewart 2009/10 type season since 2007 Izturis is 31 and hasn't put up an ops over 750 since 2008 Polanco is 36 Now, I'm not against and older player, but this FO will no go out signing FA who are past their prime just to fill a hole before they try a bounce back candidate of some kind. Reynolds is the only one close to the right age range - and he's 29 already. He isn't the type of hitter that this FO would look for, and beyond that he's only been better than 2009/10 Stewart half of his seasons in MLB.
  13. jumbo
    That's a disingenuous comparison. DeJesus and Maholm's "low" were still solid players, and their highs were above-average starters. Ian Stewart's low was a sub-replacement player and his high was a barely average starter in part-time duty. You could pick up some terrible career organizational minor leaguer coming off his worst season, give him a starting job and say "see! It's buy-low, just like DeJesus and Maholm!" But it's not just like them. I see your point, but Stewart was a top pick with pedigree that had struggled with injuries. In his 2009 and 2010 seasons he had a 780 OPS with a lot of walks. In 2010 he had 25 HR, showing some legit power. That's not sub replacement level or career minor leaguer. The last two years have been a waste, but I don't think we can say it's due to ability until he comes back from injury.
  14. jumbo
    No, he wasn't anything remotely similar to that kind of pickup. David DeJesus was coming off a 2.2 fWAR season in which he was a bit BABIP-blipped, and had a career high of 4.4 fWAR. He had four consecutive seasons of 2.0 fWAR and 6 of his last 7 (1.9 in 2007 was the only time he missed that level). He has been who he always has been. Paul Maholm was coming off a 2.1 fWAR season and had a career high of 3.2 fWAR, and had four consecutive seasons over 2.0. He has been who he has always has been. Ian Stewart was coming off a -0.6 fWAR season in which he was BABIP screwed, awful and hurt. His career high is 1.5 fWAR. He proceeded to be awful and hurt. He has been who he always has been. David DeJesus and Paul Maholm were established MLB starting-quality players who the market undervalued. Ian Stewart is a player who was once thought to have some talent but has been bad almost his career. He's not remotely comparable to the former two. DeJesus and Stewart were both coming off career lows in WAR. Maholm had his value diminish due to a shoulder injury. All were buy-low acquisitions.
  15. jumbo
    What corner? The "Ian Stewart sucks at baseball, and any front office worth its salt should be able to do better if given two consecutive offseasons to try to find a third baseman?" If that's a corner, you didn't back me into it. I walked there on my own because it's where the truth is. Vitters is what he is. A fringe MLB hitter who *might* hit enough to stick at a premium position. The 33% K-rate is definitely disappointing at this point and doesn't make things look good for him in the future, but he's not been a .300 OPS quality hitter either. He really does have a .114 BABIP. I brought up Vitters in an attempt to call out the blind rage exhibited in many posts, but was clearly not successful. Let's leave this decent young fella out of this. If you think the front office is terrible for trying out Stewart last season or next season you should remember that he was the same kind of pick up as DeJesus and Maholm, both of which were successful signings. The FO took an approach to the off season and experienced some, but not total success. I fully expect them to employ a nearly identical approach this coming off season.
  16. jumbo
    We spent all this money on the best front office in baseball so that we could absolve them of trying to find good players if it looks like it might be kinda hard. What a turd of a response. If the FA market sucks and there's not a smart trade available, what do you want them to do for 3B next season? Find someone better than Ian Stewart. And if they can't, resign. This is a rational way to view the situation. Maybe Vitters should resign from baseball because he's not having success so far.
  17. jumbo
    I think you're right on Valbuena, but I think Ian Stewart is more likely to have another crack at 3B than Rolen or someone similar.
  18. jumbo
    I never pieced that together, but it is accurate and horrifying.
  19. jumbo
    Ha - I suppose that sooner or later one of the insults hurled at him is funny. I just find it absurd that he's universally recognized as the board punching bag and 1) he keeps coming back and 2) people keep reading. Yeah, because if people say bad things about you, you should just run away and cry and never show your face again. He can be here all he wants, as far as I'm concerned. If someone doesn't like a poster, they should, oh, I don't know.... USE THEIR IGNORE FEATURE, or shut the hell up about it because it can't be that bad if you're completely unwilling to act. I do use the feature. It's been discussed elsewhere recently. It's funny that you'd tell me to shut the hell up in a comment defending someone's else right to post whatever they want. No big deal - not looking for an argument.
  20. jumbo
    Ha - I suppose that sooner or later one of the insults hurled at him is funny. I just find it absurd that he's universally recognized as the board punching bag and 1) he keeps coming back and 2) people keep reading.
  21. jumbo
    Looked like pretty easy power.
  22. jumbo
    Try it sometime. See how it works for you.
  23. jumbo
    1) He's not breaking any rules 2) Use the ignore function if needed. Seriously. I do have him ignored. Here's what happens: Ignored post I don't see. Reply telling him he's an idiot. Reply telling him he's an idiot. Reply telling him he's an idiot. Reply telling him he's an idiot. Another post I've ignored. Reply telling him he's an idiot. Reply telling him he's an idiot. Reply telling him he's an idiot. Reply telling him he's an idiot. Then the next topic has the same thing. I realize being a moron is not against the rules. It brings down the site. Yes I'm still reading the site because there are people making comments that I value. Then there's this that comes with it. I'm sure I'm not the only one who doesn't care for it. I find it very intriguing that you find the person making the post you've ignored to be the problem in that scenario. I'm just pointing it out to the board. Everybody can read into it what they want. I've encouraged people who reply to ignore him before, too. If it was my board I'd tell him to get lost, but it's not.
  24. jumbo
    1) He's not breaking any rules 2) Use the ignore function if needed. Seriously. I do have him ignored. Here's what happens: Ignored post I don't see. Reply telling him he's an idiot. Reply telling him he's an idiot. Reply telling him he's an idiot. Reply telling him he's an idiot. Another post I've ignored. Reply telling him he's an idiot. Reply telling him he's an idiot. Reply telling him he's an idiot. Reply telling him he's an idiot. Then the next topic has the same thing. I realize being a moron is not against the rules. It brings down the site. Yes I'm still reading the site because there are people making comments that I value. Then there's this that comes with it. I'm sure I'm not the only one who doesn't care for it.
  25. jumbo
    Why is he allowed to post at all? Many threads end up dedicated to telling him what a dumbass he is. He then adds another stupid comment and the entire process is repeated. It's all so pointless.
×
×
  • Create New...