Nobody is misunderstanding anything but you. You tried to use a pathetic analogy stating that incidents, many of them isolated, by white guys, were ignored by the fans and press, while Zambrano was a victim of racism. I went on to cite that if a kid like you remembers the "white guy" stuff when he wasnt even alive to see much of it, it must have gotten, and continues to get plenty of press. I then went on to cite how your beloved white guys were treated as badly as Zambrano. Zambrano would have been gone from most organizations long before the Cubs finally cut him loose. . Lots of bad equivocation in that post. "Ignored" doesn't mean nobody ever heard of it (though some of the incidents were very sparsely reported on compared to what you would get today. It took some digging to find. Most casual fans will have never heard of it). It means ignored when forming opinions. Disregarded. Your "treated as badly" isn't applicable because again, this isn't about how the Cubs organization or Hall of Fame voters treated the players. I don't care that Zambrano was traded. I care that he was made the victim of a ridiculous media campaign to run him out of town. You are either misunderstanding or intentionally trying to obfuscate in order to turn a blind eye to the institutional racism. I was giving you the benefit of the doubt. A ridiculous media campaign to run him out of town? This is the stuff I'm talking about. It seems some people are so convinced about this racist media crap that they actually blame the media for Zambrano being run out of town? Come on, man. There might be examples you could use that I might not agree with but perhaps would make me pause. Carlos Zambrano is at the top of the list of ones that won't.