Jump to content
North Side Baseball

minnesotacubsfan

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    25,068

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by minnesotacubsfan

  1. minnesotacubsfan
    Well there are likely replacements who could hit higher than 72%, maybe even as well as league average (~84% on FG and 95% on PAT). You know who else probably will? Cody Parkey (84% and 95.8% career averages). Great. He SHOULD be league average. Instead, he’s currently well below it. I look forward to him hitting his next 15 in a row.
  2. minnesotacubsfan
    4 times. honestly, it kind of reminds me of Goulds first year where he was missing (and missing a lot). That time, it was def the wind causing most of his misses. But if it isn't the wind or ball placement or a slick turf causing Parkey issues, then he just sucks. You can't tell me there isn't a viable replacement out there who can reliably hit xp's and higher than 72% on FG's w/o the field being the cause. You can't tell me that you saw the kicking between Gould and Parkey and still believer there is a viable replacement. Like Jersey said, he hit the uprights 4 times. Literally missing by inches (you can hit the upright and still make a kick, so this is literal). He was fine before yesterday (not good, but fine). He was bad yesterday, but not that bad. He'll likely be more like before yesterday than he was yesterday. The goal posts are 18’-6” wide. Wth is he aiming at?
  3. minnesotacubsfan
    considering the unique relationship wind can have for this players performance (kicker), I would disagree. i would think of all the players, the kicker and punter have to be able to understand how the wind works in their home stadiums the most. And if it isn't that big of a deal, then he just plain sucks at his position. This might make sense if the wind was pushing his kicks way off the mark. But he was hitting uprights. 4 times. honestly, it kind of reminds me of Goulds first year where he was missing (and missing a lot). That time, it was def the wind causing most of his misses. But if it isn't the wind or ball placement or a slick turf causing Parkey issues, then he just sucks. You can't tell me there isn't a viable replacement out there who can reliably hit xp's and higher than 72% on FG's w/o the field being the cause.
  4. minnesotacubsfan
    Honestly, those numbers are better than I thought. But he's missed 5 out of 18 FG's now, missing 2 XP's notwithstanding. That just isn't acceptable especially when it appears he doesn't want to get to know his home field because of "traffic". He will now, obviously. And none of my criticism had anything to do with his "manliness". It can be entirely unacceptable and also our best option at this point. That could be true. and it would suck. He isn't having a huge effect on the games when we score 4-5 td's and lead by 17 at half, but in a close playoff game do you trust him to hit even a 45 yarder?
  5. minnesotacubsfan
    considering the unique relationship wind can have for this players performance (kicker), I would disagree. i would think of all the players, the kicker and punter have to be able to understand how the wind works in their home stadiums the most. And if it isn't that big of a deal, then he just plain sucks at his position.
  6. minnesotacubsfan
    Honestly, those numbers are better than I thought. But he's missed 5 out of 18 FG's now, missing 2 XP's notwithstanding. That just isn't acceptable especially when it appears he doesn't want to get to know his home field because of "traffic". He will now, obviously. And none of my criticism had anything to do with his "manliness".
  7. minnesotacubsfan
    based off of twitter, it seems a lot of chicago sports radio talk is saying parkey didn't want to spend the extra time driving into soldier field to practice a couple times a week. In earnest? I don't get the concern. Regardless of the traffic, he plays for the Bears. I would guess the fine people at Soldier Field would allow him to practice whenever and for how long he needed or wanted to. So to me, the traffic argument seems lazy on his part. Sure, it might take him 1.5 hrs to get there, they aren't going to make him rush through his workout or turn him away.
  8. minnesotacubsfan
    Parkeys had a bad SEASON. its not one game like Crosby. And Crosby is about the worse kicker out of all of the cold climate open-air stadiums across the NFL, so not a great example. I'd love to see him turn it around, but when I hear he doesn't want to practice at Soldier Field (a place he HAS to be able to kick in) and he has every opportunity to do so, he just doesn't inspire optimism in me. It looks like the Bears are going to make him do that so we will see how it affects him.
  9. minnesotacubsfan
    I'm going to guess Parkey is willing to put in work. Well he HAS to now
  10. minnesotacubsfan
    smart plan. hopefully, he doesn't get stuck in the traffic and miss his appointments.
  11. minnesotacubsfan
    where's the list? There has to be at least one worth looking at I think it was Hub yesterday mentioned a band of kickers traveling the league looking for work like it was a circus. He said there is a reason that they are out of work and none of them will be better than Parkey. I don't think I'd put much trust in what Hub says, but I get the idea that the best options are already employed. That being said, why cant we get a guy who will practice at Soldier so he understands that field? I remember Gould having a hell of time his first year there and having to learn the field and the winds that wreak havoc there. There has to be someone willing to put in the work.
  12. minnesotacubsfan
    Let's not pretend this was the first time he's had issues. I'm not. He's not very good. But they've been cycling through kickers for a while now because a lot of them are not very good, especially guys that are currently available. where's the list? There has to be at least one worth looking at
  13. minnesotacubsfan
    I feel like the Bears need to beat the Vikings and Packers at home before getting too giddy about their playoff run. Winning all 3 of those upcoming games would def put them on everyones target, however.
  14. minnesotacubsfan
    Bears may not need to beat 3 in a row. Every year the playoffs see an upset or two.
  15. minnesotacubsfan
    at least we got the game right Bears cant spell
  16. minnesotacubsfan
    Mack had 2 sacks. whats that tell you and mitch played very well. He's starting to find the open receivers he missed earlier int he season. Anthony Millers TD, Miller was WIDE open and just had to juke one defender
  17. minnesotacubsfan
    Well its not perfect....
  18. minnesotacubsfan
    good game
  19. minnesotacubsfan
    NEW KICKER.
  20. minnesotacubsfan
    fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuunnnnnn
  21. minnesotacubsfan
    Robinson looks like the guy we all wanted. 98 yrs and a TD on 3 catches so far. I'll take that
  22. minnesotacubsfan
    Mitch.
  23. minnesotacubsfan
    A trade thay big is: Red Sox Yankees The team that just lost 2 : Dodgers Since the bosox look like gods next superteam, id say its the yankees that want Bryant. Well then sign Harper That kinda makes sense, but its also really weird.
  24. minnesotacubsfan
    My money is on option 2. It probably isn't actual collusion, but this is what collusion would look like. it could only be collusion if one of the teams were to sign him well under market value while the others stood around and watched and somehow getting a kick-back, which won't happen
  25. minnesotacubsfan
    memories of Keith in 2010. CHAMPIONSHIP!! (?) jk
×
×
  • Create New...