After watching it 9 million times I agree it was a "clean" hit by the rulebook. However, Kronwall should know better... that was incredibly dangerous and I'm glad he got 5 for it but I don't think he should have. That being said, I hope someone knocks him into next month in tomorrow's game. Well, the nice thing about the rulebook is that it's incredibly vague. If you wanted to, and the refs did, you could call that charging (which is written so vaguely that almost any hit could be called it), you could call it interference (until he touches the puck, he's not considered in possession, even though it's at his feet), and you could call it intent to injure. Def. should have been charging... he didn't have even one of his brain cells focused on playing the puck... he was going after Havlat to LEVEL him (which he did). The hit was clean but I can easily see intent to injure as well. Oh well, Havlat was alert and responsive after the game and didn't have a headache, was joking about it in the locker room.