Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Backtobanks

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    7,353
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Backtobanks

  1. A new world's record: Nine posts before someone blames Hendry. Now we're blaming Hendry for Lou's senility/dementia/bad decisions. be honest- did you even read his post? Yeah, I read his post. The discussion was about Lou's senility, dementia, bad decisions, inability to string together a complete sentence, etc. and H4H blamed Hendry for putting together a weak bench. I don't think a weak bench can be blamed for mental instability.
  2. A new world's record: Nine posts before someone blames Hendry. Now we're blaming Hendry for Lou's senility/dementia/bad decisions.
  3. Rothschild seems to be highly regarded as a very good pitching coach among baseball people. I would imagine his job is as safe as Lou's and Hendry's.
  4. Let's see. - Everyone here knew signing Miles, especially as basically DeRosa's replacement, was a stupid idea. - Everyone here knew that Bradley was injury-prone. - Everyone here, for the most part, could see that Derrek Lee had been declining throughout most of 2008. (I'm glad he's on the uptick right now, but he's got a long way to go before having a productive full season.) - Most here, while glad to be rid of Jason Marquis, thought it was iffy to bring in a nothing reliever for him. - Everyone here was skeptical as to why we were shedding like 5M in bullpen pitchers for no apparent reason less than two weeks in when we weren't exactly loaded with great relievers. - Most here were skeptical of Dempster's contract considering his career numbers. This isn't hindsight. For the most part, these moves were bad even in foresight. Spot on. Miles was signed as a reserve IF and not as an everyday player (like DeRosa). Also, it was pointed out that the Cubs ended up paying him what the Cards were offering. Everyone knew Bradley was injury prone, but he was the most productive OF available. DLee was signed to a large NTC after a great year like dozens of other ML players, some of whom are mediocre at best. Trading Marquis for Viscaino is a perfect example of hindsight, since nobody knew if there were any other offers for Marquis. Everyone wanted Marquis gone and the deal saved app. 5 million. The bullpen has been a problem, so I'll give you that one. Dempster was signed at the going rate for pitchers coming off of a very good season. Not signing him would have left a hole in the rotation that would have meant signing some other pitcher. Given all the the information that Hendry had at the time and the parameters he had to use, I'm sure he thought he was doing the right thing. Of course, in our fantasy-league minds with no information at the time, all of us could have done better.
  5. Unfortunately, Hendry wasn't hired this off season, so we have a lot more than just 2 months of regular season games on which to judge him. You're correct. Check out his regular season record as a GM for the past two seasons and you might judge him to be among the best.
  6. As one scout said, referring to the periodic outbursts of Zambrano and outfielder Milton Bradley, "When Lou has the third-worst temper on the team, you know you're in trouble." =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>
  7. Except for third, can anyone think of a better way to upgrade the offense than this route? We're not upgrading at catcher, first, short, center, or right. There's just no way. An upgrade at second that simply replaces Fontenot... well, who is out there? Dan Uggla? Moving Soriano back to second seems to be the only way to open up trading possibilities. Since you're going to weaken the defense, why not hand the 3B job to Fox until he proves he can't hit ML pitching. Fox at 3B can't be much worse than Soriano at 2B considering the number of plays each position is involved in during a game. That way we don't have to give up the prospects that Beane would want.
  8. I'll repeat what I posted earlier: It's amazing how smart hindsight makes everyone. All of a sudden everyone knew who would slump this year, what trades (and signings) would be terrible, what players we should have signed, how much we should have payed FAs, etc. None of us have to deal with other GMs involving trades, try to acquire the players that our manager wants on the team, and deal with the agents of FAs all while trying to stay within some kind of bugetary constraints. Looking at deals made and players stats 2 months into the season isn't the fairest way to judge a GM.
  9. And there isn't a person on this board that would have looked at Fontenot's production last year and Bradley's production throughout his career and describe either as "any crappy lefty bat you can scrape up". It's amazing how hindsight makes us all so much smarter.
  10. Can you imagine how many bunts down the 3B line there would be if Fox was at 3B?
  11. All that is well and good, but it doesn't change the fact that a NTC is just a negotiating asset, and a pitcher would be foolish to pass up the opportunity to pitch in SD. One of these days Shark might grow up enough to realize that pitching in setup roles in Chicago might be less fulfilling ($$$$) than starting in SD. When he maxes out at about $3 million and sees decent starting pitchers getting $10-$12 million, he might understand that he could move his whole family out to SD with a few months salary.
  12. It's amazing to me that all of this nonsense is being dumped in Hendry's lap. Lou (and Dusty before him) is the one setting these agendas, by and large. This whole getting more lefthanded business mostly Piniella's idea. Hendry's options are: a) construct the team in the way his manager wants it (what he's doing now), or b) fire the manager and hire one with a different philosophy (what he did when Dusty's gameplan wasn't working). Regardless, the GM and the manager need to be reading from the same playbook, and that comes predominantly from the manager. I totally agree. From the start, it's been Hendry's MO to let the manager run the team on the field. Whatever his manager(s) wants he gets for them even if he doesn't necessarily agree. Hendry always pushed for giving youngsters a chance, but Dusty wanted veterans and played veterans. Lou wanted more LH bats in the lineup and Hendry made it possible by trading DeRosa and giving Fontenot 2B while signing Bradley. Unfortunately, Bradley and Fontenot have slumped and Ramirez got hurt leaving a hole at 3B.
  13. Having Johnson on this team would provide company for Bradley on the DL for 60-80 games. Also, I mentioned tweaking the deal with prospects if necessary. right, but d lee isn't exactly the superman of health anymore why give up more for cantu than lee? why not just get johnson instead? Getting Johnson would still involve getting rid of Lee. I'm sure the Nationals don't want him. Also, we already have a LH 1B in Hoffpauir.
  14. I can't see the Cubs becoming sellers. The NL Central is not going to have a run-away winner (unless the Cubs get it together) and the expectation level is too high to start over again.
  15. No, no it wouldn't. I know you're an optimist but let's be real. This team hasn't won a playoff game together. I think it's time to rebuild and build up our farm system. If someone offers great prospects for one of our players and we continue to look like we have this week, you take the deal in a heartbeat. It's time to rebuild and build a world series champion. Come on. Do you honestly think this team is capable of winning a World Series? It depends on what team you're talking about. Are you talking about the team that has Fontenot playing 3B or Ramirez? Are you talking about the team that has 3-4 regulars struggling to get above .200 or the team that has Lee, Soto, Fontenot, and Bradley hitting close to what's expected of them? Obviously the team that on the field right now, hitting and pitching the way they are, has no chance of making the playoffs (let alone winning the WS).
  16. Having Johnson on this team would provide company for Bradley on the DL for 60-80 games. Also, I mentioned tweaking the deal with prospects if necessary.
  17. I'm not sure that's the case. Uggla's already nearly 30, plays awful defense, and isn't hitting right now. Lee plays very good defense, is hitting right now, and has a much better track record to fall back on. There is the age gap, and the fact that Uggla makes his attempt at defense at 2B, but if a team thinks Lee has his stroke back, I can see them potentially valuing him as highly as Uggla. Well said. I'm tired of posters complaining about how terrible our players are and how great opposing players are. In my original post I mentioned sending Lee with cash to bring his salary down to $5-6 million to solve one part of the problem (his NTC is the other). I think that a team that has a big hole at 1B (like the Giants) might appreciate a solid veteran that brings leadership and outstanding defense to the team. Some of the other names they were kicking around were Konerko, Nick Johnson, Holliday, and Uggla. Having the money issue resolved, I would take Lee over those guys.
  18. Before you LOL, today's MLBTR suggests the Giants might have to give up Cain or Sanchez for Uggla!!!!! Giants Inquire On Uggla By Eddie Schmid [May 24 at 7:21pm CST] Juan C. Rodriguez at the Sun-Sentinel says the Giants have had preliminary discussions with the Marlins about second baseman Dan Uggla, "though they are not believed to have reached general manager level." This jives with reports that Marlins owner Jeffrey Loria wants "substantive changes" for his team. Rodriguez says the Giants would almost certainly have to part with Matt Cain or Jonathan Sanchez if such a deal were to go through. Rodriguez also speculates that the Giants might be kicking the tires on Nick Johnson and Mark DeRosa in their quest for a bat.
  19. I agree that the Giants could trade Cain for Cantu, but that wouldn't our cubbies. I'm sure DLee won't waive his NTC (even to the West Coast), but getting an established star that would soldify the infield defense for their other pitchers at $5 or $6 million might make them think. Having Lee would allow them to be patient with Sandoval.
  20. I know you've been waiting, so here is a 3-way trade suggestion: Giants receive: DLee plus big time cash (assuming he waives his NTC to go to the West Coast) Marlins receive: Matt Cain Cubs receive: Jorge Cantu Tweak the deal with prospects and/or cash to make it happen. Giants are shopping Cain and have a big hole at 1B. Lee at $5-$6 million soldifies 1B and provides a decent veteran hitter. Cantu is close to becoming too expensive for the Marlins and Cain provides a strong, cheap, proven starter. Cubs get security at 3B, 1B, and 2B in Cantu.
  21. As usual we should blame Hendry for building the best team in the NL for the last few years. Most everyone on this board wanted Piniella to be hired (or Girardi who's doing worse with a team full of all-stars). Everybody was excited about Perry bringing in a new hitting philosophy that had the Cubs leading the league in runs. Most everyone clamored for Bradley with his outstanding offensive numbers. Posters were amazed that Hendry could get Harden for the rotation. Let me make a prediction - it will be Hendry's fault when Peavy's arm falls off after the Cubs acquire him in July. The numbers that Miles, Gregg, Bradley, Heilman, Fontenot, etc. certainly haven't been impressive, but you're fooling yourself if you think the numbers that DeRosa, Wood, Murton, Cedeno, Pie, and Hill have put up would have us running away with the NL Central.
  22. Prado is a backup IF with the Braves and probably will remain a backup IF with the Braves. I agree that Johnson alone probably wouldn't do it, but adding cash and/or a prospect might get it done. The Braves OF situation is pretty desperate. Blalock/Beltre/Mora might be cheaper to acquire (in players), but would cost more in money. Also, Blalock/Beltre/Mora might not be able to succeed in a backup role once Aram returns while Prado could back up everywhere in the IF. We already have enough backup middle infielders that were tyring to use as starters and it isnt working out. Martin gas respectable stats for a backup, but as a starter, hes probably Omar Infante at best. My point is that I think Prado is definitely an upgrade to Miles/Freel/Scales (and right now Fontenot). Let's not forget that he a backup to some pretty good players (Jones, Escobar, and Johnson). He does have experience at 3B and some at 1B, along with the MI. It wouldn't be an earth-shattering acquisition, but he looks to be a capable fill-in for Ramirez immediately and a solid role player for the future. Blalock/Mora/Beltre is trying to catch lightning-in-a-bottle for two months and then they would serve no purpose and might cause problems with being considered a backup. We need the lightening in a bottle. The 2 monts back up is what they need. After that, they can be a pinch hitter for all I care. Even if Ramirez does make it back by July or August, he'll need a day off here and there. My point is, Id rather get someone we know can be an upgrade over what we have, not someone who might be. Are you sure Beltre (.213/.246/.308/.554 - $13 million) or Mora (.260/.315/.340/.655 - $8million) can deliver "lightning in a bottle". Those numbers aren't much different from Fontenot's for this season. While Blalock (.250/.281/.555/.837 - $6.2 million) might be able to give us some offense, he has only played 70 games at 3B over the last two years. Can he still handle 3B?
  23. Prado is a backup IF with the Braves and probably will remain a backup IF with the Braves. I agree that Johnson alone probably wouldn't do it, but adding cash and/or a prospect might get it done. The Braves OF situation is pretty desperate. Blalock/Beltre/Mora might be cheaper to acquire (in players), but would cost more in money. Also, Blalock/Beltre/Mora might not be able to succeed in a backup role once Aram returns while Prado could back up everywhere in the IF. We already have enough backup middle infielders that were tyring to use as starters and it isnt working out. Martin gas respectable stats for a backup, but as a starter, hes probably Omar Infante at best. My point is that I think Prado is definitely an upgrade to Miles/Freel/Scales (and right now Fontenot). Let's not forget that he a backup to some pretty good players (Jones, Escobar, and Johnson). He does have experience at 3B and some at 1B, along with the MI. It wouldn't be an earth-shattering acquisition, but he looks to be a capable fill-in for Ramirez immediately and a solid role player for the future. Blalock/Mora/Beltre is trying to catch lightning-in-a-bottle for two months and then they would serve no purpose and might cause problems with being considered a backup.
  24. Prado is a backup IF with the Braves and probably will remain a backup IF with the Braves. I agree that Johnson alone probably wouldn't do it, but adding cash and/or a prospect might get it done. The Braves OF situation is pretty desperate. Blalock/Beltre/Mora might be cheaper to acquire (in players), but would cost more in money. Also, Blalock/Beltre/Mora might not be able to succeed in a backup role once Aram returns while Prado could back up everywhere in the IF.
×
×
  • Create New...