Backtobanks

cuddyer is a pretty good player who's versatile; why are they just going to dump him for nothing? He is a pretty good player, versatile, and makes $10.5 million. Obviously the Twins might get better prospects if they throw in some money.

From MLBTR: Twins May Explore Kevin Slowey Trade By Tim Dierkes [May 23 at 10:57am CST] The Kevin Slowey relief experiment has ended, and a change of scenery appears to be in order. The 27-year-old control artist told Twins manager Ron Gardenhire he was having a hard time as a reliever, according to La Velle E. Neal III of the Minneapolis Star-Tribune. Slowey is headed back to Triple-A to get stretched out as a starter, but Gardenhire implied on ESPN 1500 that the right thing is to find the righty a starting opportunity with another club. Some team has a chance to buy low on Slowey, though, since he is capable of a sub-4.00 ERA. Slowey is earning $2.7MM this year, and is under team control through 2013 as an arbitration eligible player. Given how the 2011 season has gone so far, his 2012 raise should be limited. Since the Twins will be selling soon, maybe we can give them some salary relief and plug a couple of holes at the same time. How about Cuddyer and Slowey for a package built around Colvin, Grabow (to help with the money issue), and young pitching (Stevens, Berg, Maine, Coleman, etc.). The additional cost to the Cubs would be the prorated share of $8.4 million (app. $5.5 million now). Slowey can be the #5 starter while Cuddyer can provide some power while playing RF/1B/PH. Both Cuddyer and Grabow come off the books after this year.

These two guys aren't idiots. Neither one is going to take anything less than 7-8 years unless Pujols continues to struggle and takes a 1-year to rebuild his worth. Both of them realize that this is their last big payday.

Obviously it depends on the cost/years. If Pujols is $300 million/10 years and Prince is for $170 million/8 years, it gets to be a tough decision. Of course that's the maximum Pujols will get while Prince could get more than what I mentioned. Also, if Pujols continues to have a down year, all of the numbers mentioned could change dramatically.

There's no way that I would trade Soto, but the Red Sox might offer a king's ransom for him.

Even with a day/night doubleheader on June 28th we must have increased our odds of winning this game. Lincecum vs. Coleman, DeWitt in the OF, Hill catching, and Johnson starting could have been really ugly.

I was happy with him last year, but I always wondered if he was going to keep it going once the pitchers adjusted to him. He really needs to be more consistent if he has any hope of even being a 4th OF. AAA might help regain some trade value if he's not going to be part of the Cubs' future.

Byrd has a 15 game hitting streak, Soriano is about the only power threat in the lineup at this point, and Fukudome is hitting .350+ And DeWitt and Baker are getting in practice in the OF. It looks like Colvin and Quade have lost confidence in his ability.

I just don't see the urgency to go for it this year. Obviously we want to win the World Series and if we have a legit shot I say take it. However, I think our chances of winning will be better over the next couple of years than they are now (even without Pujols/Prince), so if we don't get a good price on Beltran I don't think the need is there to shell out for him. I think most of us are saying that Beltran should be a possibility only if we are contending and don't have to overpay. It might be good experience for our young players to get playoff experience even if winning the WS isn't going to happen this year.

Trading Byrd is probably the route to get the biggest upgrade, but I really don't think the Mets will want either Byrd or Kosuke. With their financial troubles, adding even a reduced contract may not be an option. My bet is if they want an ML ready OF, it'd be Colvin. Even if they're not enamored by him, he's cheaper with more upside going forward than Byrd or Kosuke. Looking ahead, however, trading Byrd this season means we're guaranteed to see Colvin in RF next season. I don't see any way Kosuke comes back next year and with Byrd gone we'd have to start Colvin and hope BJax is ready to start the year. If we keep Byrd, Quade may decide to go with Jackson and let Colvin remain as the 4th OF. We'd be a better team overall next season in the latter scenario, but worse this year. I do wonder if Colvin can rebound from a what seems to be a complete loss of confidence. With DeWitt getting practice in the OF and rumors of Colvin being sent to AAA, trading Colvin for Beltran might be something to think about if the Cubs are stil in the hunt at the deadline.

The "experts" weigh in, from MLBTR: •It will be interesting to see how Carlos Beltran’s $18.5MM salary affects other teams’ interest in him midseason, as ESPN.com's Buster Olney explains. Few teams have $6MM kicking around for a two-month rental, and that’s how much will remain on Beltran’s contract at the end of July. Olney suggests the Mets could get a decent prospect for Beltran if he continues his hot hitting (the free agent to be had a three-homer game yesterday). •Matt Klaassen of FanGraphs examines Carlos Beltran's trade value and says "it is hard to imagine the Mets getting more than a couple of C prospects in return for Beltran if they send a few million dollars along."

ugh...Yes, anyone who thinks Hendry should be replaced because they are not satisfied with the results under his regime is BLINDED BY HATE! Very helpful. But at least you appreciate Tim's rational approach. It's perfectly rational to be of the opinion that the Cubs are better off entering next off-season, one in which they potentially have a large amount of money to spend, with a different GM. Tim, CCP, TT and others have given perfectly reasonable arguments against booting Hendry, but disagreeing with them doesn't make one blinded by hatred. I already stated I'd like to see him replaced, but I fully acknowledge I don't have an available, sure-fire improvement in mind. Again, it's not an "anybody but Hendry" situation, but as far as I can tell, nobody in this thread is saying it is. I don't understand why people are suggesting otherwise. If you have read all of the many threads about Hendry, I would say that there are more than a few posters who think Hendry needs to be replaced because he's the worst GM (or in the bottom 5) in baseball. When some posters can't acknowledge anything positive that he has done, I think those posters are blinded by hate. My point is that Hendry has done some good things and some not-so-good things. If you look at Hendry's record, it's not a slam dunk that he should be fired (or kept). You are correct that there isn't an available, sure-fire improvement out there.

The number of those contracts handed out by Hendry lately has been nearly nil. We are filling the bench with young players and cheap veterans. The bullpen is almost entirely home grown at this point. Grabow is really the only bad role player contract on the team right now and I wouldn't be surprised if he's shipped off before the end of the season to be replaced internally. Koyie Hill could be considered a bad contract, but it's probably better to have Castillo in the minors getting ab's anyway. And I have a feeling that with the glut of serviceable backup C's in the upper levels of the minors, Koyie's tenure with the team won't last all that much longer, anyway. A lot of the traditional criticisms of Hendry have been addressed the past few years. The plan for next year is pretty easy: put Pujols at 1B, a placeholder at 3B if Aramis doesn't pick up the pace and put Brett Jackson in the OF in Kosuke's role. The bullpen is pretty well set already, but Chris Carpenter will take Grabow's place and be another realistic late inning option. The big question is Dempster's spot in the rotation. We should have enough money to go out and sign a starter in addition to bringing in Pujols, but McNutt might also be ready for the role at that point. We should also have the assets to make a bold move for someone like King Felix if Seattle decides to shop him. Frankly, I wouldn't mind extending Hendry at this point to a very modest extension - say, 1-2 years - and letting him continue the current process. I certainly wouldn't mind a new GM, either, but I'd be very nervous about the hire. I'd also be nervous about it impacting the signing of Pujols or Prince, which is easily the most important thing this team has to get done in the next few years. You have to be kidding. Two more years just because the next guy may be worse? Fear is a terrible way to run a business. By this rationale we may as well keep the FO intact forever. You obviously didn't comprehend the post if that's what you got out of it. 1) Hendry has corrected many of his past faults 2) He has the team well positioned to be elite with the addition of a Pujols or Fielder 3) This offseason has that one critical transaction that I don't want interrupted due to a change in leadership 4) LASTLY, I'm concerned that with Hendry correcting many of the faults that previously led him astray, the next GM would be worse than the one we have. If you don't feel this is a concern, can you name a surefire elite GM who is available for hire? Tim, I enjoyed your posts because they explained everything in a calm, rational manner instead of the posters who are blinded by hate for Hendry. As for the posters who wonder what a low-budget GM (Beane or Moore) could do with Hendry's budget, they might be surprised to find that their strength might come from finding value in players to produce in a low expectation, small market city and not in a high expectation, major market, media driven city.

It does crack me up that for all of the "Hendry hate", the bottom line is Hendry is somewhere in the middle of the pack when it comes to GMs. As you stated, the results have wildly fluctuated. His weaknesses start with spending money on secondary players and following the advice of his managers too often. Hendry has always pushed for developing a better farm system and promoting through the farm system, but Chicago (Tribune, fans, and media) push for immediate results. It's the nature of the job to be criticized for every move you make or don't make. All of the discussion over the years about all of the brilliant GMs that could work miracles with Hendry's budget are just opinion since there's no way of proving it. As others have posted, Hendry has raised the expectation level, but failed to deliver. If Ricketts decides to fire him, hopefully it will be for a better GM and not one that's worse (Coletti).

From MLBTR: The Cubs released catcher Max Ramirez, Matt Eddy of Baseball America reports (on Twitter). The 26-year-old backstop is a free agent after a turbulent year that has seen him claimed off of waivers twice. The Red Sox claimed Ramirez in January after coveting him for years. Five days later, they exposed him to waivers and the Cubs claimed him. Once a highly regarded prospect, Ramirez hit just .235/.300/.353 in 40 plate appearances at Triple-A Iowa. It's far from his career minor league line of .297/.394/.474, but the sample is small enough that another organization figures to give him a chance if he's looking for one. The Twins, for example, could sign him to a minor league deal.

an expiring contract? this isn't the nba. Wouldn't that potentially have some appeal to a team in serious financial trouble? Thank you. The mets are so bad off right now that they need to start shipping guys out quickly. I'm pretty sure they are 600 million in the hole and no one is going to their games. But yeah the mets would take some back lash for trading wright so they would at least need to feign competitiveness by picking up a deteriorating veteran who they arent on the hook for past this year. all the while picking up pitchers which is the biggest reason why they have sucked for the last 8 years. They are looking to sell a percentage of the team to get some ready cash. Making the team less valuable isn't in their best interests. I highly doubt they trade Wright but I could see Reyes go. Reyes and Beltran (if they can find a taker while eating some of his contract).

While most people (myself included) don't have serious hopes for contending this year, it is still early in the season. When you have the White Sox and Twins playing below .400 ball, 10 players in the NL batting .349 or better, Weaver at 6-0 with an ERA under 1, and Albert Pujols hitting .250, you know there's lots of games left.

True. I'd still love to make 100s of thousands of dollars pitching at Wrigley Yeah, there are tougher ways to make a good living than being on the Chicago/Iowa shuttle.

If I didn't know better, I'd start to suspect we aren't world beaters. Obviously not world beaters, but when you have 2/5 of your rotation as non ML-starters the results are pretty predictable. Eliminate the 12-2 and the 11-2 blowouts started by Coleman and Russell and you have a -14 run differential in 18 games. which is still ****ing terrible. So far the Cubs have shown they're a team flirting with .500, which is pretty much what everybody expected. It's still early, but things might get a little better when Cashner and Wells return, the other starters show more consistency, and production from Pena, Soto, and Byrd picks up. Of course, there's a good chance that Castro and Barney come back down to earth to negate some of the positives.

If I didn't know better, I'd start to suspect we aren't world beaters. Obviously not world beaters, but when you have 2/5 of your rotation as non ML-starters the results are pretty predictable. Eliminate the 12-2 and the 11-2 blowouts started by Coleman and Russell and you have a -14 run differential in 18 games.

I'd take a flyer on him if you need somebody to fill out a minor league roster, but not on the ML roster. As for career stats: Wood - 493 PA, .168 BA, 153/13 K/BB ratio DeWitt - 869 PA, .258 BA, 164/96 K/BB ratio

Unless he leads the league in hitting, it's going to be hard to make an ALL Star team with Tulo and HRam in the same league. you underestimated the vance factor Don't say his name... he needs his rest before the ballot opens. Then the beast awakens. Justafiable or not, I wouldnt be shocked if Castro beats those 2 in the ballots. As we learned in 2008, when Cubs fans are excited about a player(s), they tend to go nuts on the ballots. If nothing esle,, hed probably be the Cubs pity all star if it comes down to that. Castro might beat out HRam because the Marlins barely draw 10,000 fans to home games.

Unless he leads the league in hitting, it's going to be hard to make an ALL Star team with Tulo and HRam in the same league.

"Jerry" ??????????????????????????????????????????????????