Well, I guess the line here would be that he was just getting something his manager valued and thought the team was lacking. Not much of a defense considering that to most it was pretty obvious that Pierre wasn't worth the price we paid. The best I can say is that at least he realized that signing Pierre would have been moranic, especially at that price. Though, he followed not overpaying Pierre with overpaying Soriano. That was the worst one in my opinion, as I don't really see a problem with trading away Maddux in principle, just what he got from it that was bad. I also don't see the Barrett/Bowen trade as being a 'negative', more a wash than anything. Furthermore, the positive weight of the Ramirez/Lofton and the Garciaparra/Murton trades, though Garciaparra didn't work out, still outweigh the negatives presented here. If Hendry is good at anything, it is definitely player acquisition via trades. I think the Grudz/Karros is the cherry on top. That was a pretty lopsided trade. I agree. Overall I think Hendry has done very well in trades and he doesn't get the credit around here that he deserves. The Ramirez, Garciaparra, and Grudz/Karros deals were very lopsided to us, whereas even Hendry's worst trades have only slightly favored the other team. Maybe we could have gotten a little more for Maddux, but we were never going to get a top level prospect. I think Hendry understands the balance between being too cautious and giving up the farm. He has never given up top prospects, yet he has consistently been aggressive in pursuing deals to help the club.