I know we had expressed some concern about whether the new rules would make the new facility a waste, but could it be argued that since the playing field has been leveled more in regards to what can be spent on IFA, it actually makes the facility MORE valuable than it would have been with the old rules, since it would just come down to money back then? I think that could definitely be argued and is probably the logical answer. If everything else is equal, wouldn't you go with the team that you knew better?