His at bats did. you could just as easily say that anyone's at-bats cost the NL the game. Maybe, but Uggla did seem to come up in most of the big spots. Look at his at-bats Came up in the 8th: 1 on, 0 outs: struck out Came up in the 10th: runners on 1st and 3rd, 1 out. Great scoring chance. Uggla grounds into a double play, inning over. Came up in the 12th: bases loaded, 1 out. For the 2nd time in extra innings, Uggla doesn't even need a base hit to score a run. He strikes out on 3 pitches. Lead off the 15th with a strikeout. The NL really had 2 chances in extra innings. Uggla had the misfortune of being really bad in some of the "biggest" at-bats in the game. Does it mean he's a choke artist? No. But he was easily the biggest reason the NL lost the game. QFT. True there were some ABs and baserunning mistakes by other members of the NL team, but those above mentioned ABs were big deterrents in the overall reason the AL won the contest. Also, none of his Es may have led to any runs or directly attributed to the loss, but he owed Aaron Cook, Miguel Tejada, Christian Guzman, and Russell Martin really expensive dinners for saving his bacon in huge ways, in the 10th(?)/11th(?) inning, when he committed those 2 back-to-back errors that allowed the bases to become loaded with either 1 or 0 outs. (Not sure if any of the outfield assists should have been attributed to his other previous error or not.)