Anyways, Northwestern and UCLA are basically even. Here's the short version: QB NU: Basanez has had a great year and brings a running game that Olson doesn't have. With 32 more yards on the ground, he'll become the first ever Division I-A QB to pass for 10,000 yards and rush for 1,000 UCLA: Olson's TD/INT ratio is big trouble for an NU secondary that relies on take-a-ways Edge: split RB NU: I don't expect Sutton to get that many carries, unfortunately, unless he gets off to a very fast start. Fumbles are going to cost them the game, so he has to hang on. Roberson is not Markey's equal. UCLA: Maurice Drew and Markey should give the Bruins a more consistent run game. Edge: split TE NU: We have a TE? UCLA: No brainer. The Wildcats are going to have a big problem containing Lewis Edge: UCLA WRs NU: We're already down one starting WR, but there are plenty of weapons, including freshman. The 'Cats are at their best when Basanez has 8 different guys to go to. You never really know what you're going to get, though. They can be quite inconsistent. UCLA: Don't know much about them, but come on, they're facing Northwestern's secondary. Edge: NU O-Line NU: Inexperienced but really played above expectations this year, allowing just 11 sacks and allowing Sutton to have a great rookie season. Strief is one of the best in the country. Don't expect the Bruins to get to Basanez too much, especially considering his above-average escaping skills. UCLA: Very solid. They're not going to get much pressure unless Northwestern calls for some poorly timed blitzes. They may be down to their third-string center, but they should have a good game and give Olson all the time in the world. Edge: NU, but only slightly D-Line NU: Northwestern has just 11 sacks all season and will have lost some much needed depth thanks one of the starters being kicked off the team. His replacement has played plenty this season, though. Either way, don't expect much. If they can do a good job tackling, they'll remain somewhat respectable. UCLA: I don't think enough to get much pressure on Basanez. If they allow the 'Cats to have early success in the running game, they could be in for a long day. Edge: NU if the 'Cats focus on the run LBers NU: Solid. Senior Tim McGarigle leads the group and most of the country in tackles. They don't have much speed, though, and don't help out enough in the passing game. Their focus needs to be on keeping Drew and Markey in front of them. UCLA: Also solid. Probably a little better if fully healthy. The question will be how well they can stop the run against a spread offense. Edge: split Secondary NU: Ouch. We're getting back Heinz, who hasn't played all season, though. He's going to add much needed depth at safety. Deante Battle's academic status is questionable, but it looks like he'll play. It's going to be hard to pick off Drew Olson, but they're going to need to do it. They've had a lot more success going after turnovers and big hits than they did before that. UCLA: Don't know much about them, but they're going to have their hands full. Basanez doesn't go deep that much, but if Northwestern's offensive gameplan is a good one, they're going to have their hands full in the middle of the game, most likely. Edge: UCLA, but only slightly Special Teams: NU: Yuck. They've made Randy Walker reconsider his position on not having a special teams coach many a time. Kickoffs should get a boost with the altitude and Howells has been okay, although they don't kick that many FGs. The punting game has been downright terrible, though. You might very well see two punters play. Neither has shown much, though. Hangtime, distance, and direction all leave a lot to be desired. And it doesn't help that they can't tackle. UCLA: If Northwestern has to punt much, Maurice Drew is going to make them pay. However, if the elevation isn't enough for the 'Cats to send kickoffs into the endzone, expect pooch kicks. FG kicking, though, is going to be a real drama. I'm guessing that you'll see UCLA go for it on 4th downs when less than 3 yards needs to be gained between the 35 and 20. Edge: UCLA, since the game shouldn't come down to FGs Extra notes NU: The 'Cats have been poor in the red zone at many points in the season. They have to convert on every opportunity they can if they expect to win. And Randy Walker's trick plays (there are going to be a couple) better not backfire. UCLA: They have the advantage of having bowl experience. The '03 Motor City bowl doesn't do much for the 'Cats. 4 weeks should be plenty of time for recovering from the loss to USC. Edge: UCLA Take your pick. Both offenses have been completely shut down this year. I think UCLA's is capable of doing a little more, but Northwestern's slight edge in defense makes up for that. Unless UCLA hangs onto the ball. This game might just come down to how the ball bounces. Then again, it could just as easily be lopsided. My prediction: Northwestern 48, UCLA 42