So here's my problem with that. (Your statement above is true & accurate, but unfortunate.) The players' union negotiates free agency dates, arbitration dates, no cap on draft picks, etc. The market dictates the number of years on contracts, the salary, and no-trade clauses. But when ownership finds a loophole in the system that works to their advantage, they can't use it because they need to remain "stand-up guys"? Alfonso Soriano is still a stand-up guy even though he isn't giving back any of his $160 million that we continue to pay him despite his lack of production (and apparent lack of drive). (I know the union won't allow players to give it back, but that's part of my point.) I don't think it's a "dirty trick" to offer arbitration in the hopes of earning a draft pick or two. His consolation prize is $1,250,000 or more in the spring and the opportunity to earn a heck of a lot more from the next team who signs him. If the players' union thought that was unfair, they would have negotiated it out. But instead, they agreed to allow teams to do that, but teams have to pay a player 25% of their contract for the right to do that. I tell Hendry to do it if he has the money to do it.