Those were just off the top. You're also now changing the rules on me. You said "Not at all." Poor wording on my part if you took that to mean there were never any guys who came over without success. But you can look more thoroughly, there aren't any recent busts, especially in the vein of Tanaka, a very successful pitcher approaching his prime years. I agree with all of that. It's still only a handful of guys, though. We have no idea if the next two or three won't bust. I want Tanaka very badly and am willing to overpay, but unlike some, I do think there should be limits. At some point it makes a lot more sense to go get Matt Garza again instead. Why would at some point would it make more sense to get the 30-year-old, injury-plagued Matt Garza for the team trying to rebuild that desperately needs starting pitchers both now and down the line? Not sure that I'd go after Garza again, but I may be interested in Ubaldo Jimenez, although Cleveland offered a qualifying offer so he'd cost a draft pick. I really doubt the Cubs would have interest for that reason.