I find it hard to believe every organization in baseball is plain stupid. Michaels looks good on paper to a point. But to call out someone and say his argument is weak by saying he hasn't proven he can put those numbers up in a full-time role, is stupid too. I think both of you guys make good arguments. Personally, I'll take my chances with a 305 career hitter, who has played full time throughout his career, over a guy who has yet to play a full time role. That doesn't mean Michaels can't do it full time, but he's never proven it. I think a GM would be stupid to take a chance on a Michaels if you can get a Pierre. It's a safer bet. I don't like a lot of Hendry's offseason moves, but getting Pierre was a GREAT move. We haven't had a real leadoff hitter since Lofton, and we saw what he did for us. Hell that year Patterson was going nuts before his injury, but we were a better team with Lofton in the lineup everyday than we were with Patterson that year. Why complain about the one decent offseason move Hendry did make?