Boston also can afford a weak bat in the lineup, because they have a better lineup than the Cubs. Ortiz and Ramirez are better than Ramirez and Lee. Plus, Varitek, Crisp, Nixon, Loretta, Youkilis provide a much better supporting cast than the Cubs have. So, Boston not only is Alex better than Neifi, his teammates are better than Neifi's teammates, which makes it easier to cover his shortcomings. And from a pitching standpoint I would say Boston's top end has as big an upside as the Cubs, and they have better depth in the rotation. They do have health questions on the pitching staff, like the Cubs, but unlike the Cubs they have a potential top 2/3 offense to make up for some potential setbacks on the staff. There are questions in the bullpen, but their best guys stack up favorably with the Cubs best relievers, and the Cubs have health/consistency quesitons of their own. Both teams have potential top 3 pitching staffs in their league, but injuries or setbacks could put either in the middle of the pack. The difference between the team is Boston is going to be a top 3 offense in their league, the Cubs won't. Boston can afford a mediocre bat here and there, the Cubs can't.