you pick one. all i'm saying is that i'm not going to feel bad for a dirty player who got hurt when someone gave it back to them. especially a guy like havlat who runs and hides when it's time to pay for his dirty play. Bah, to heck with you. No kidding. Where do you get this 'Havlat is a dirty player' business from? It was a borderline hit. It could've been called either way. I think the fact that he went a little high was caused for a call. A major? I don't know. But here's the point. Regardless, he was trying to hurt Havlat. That doesn't mean it was a bad hit. But still, Ben Eager needs to destroy someone. I mean murder someone. I don't care if he gets suspended, it's worth it to put one of their guys out. Tit for tat. If it's legal, all the better. But I don't really care at this point. because hitchock and the flyers whined about havlat's 'stickwork' like 7 years ago. probably while the flyers were busy losing yet another playoffs series Ah, during the dark ages. I could hardly watch the Hawks all those years, let alone the Eastern Conference. Obviously I'm concerned that it's only 2-0. And no doubt, like Sharp said in the interview with Harwood, the guys were very scattered on that PP because they were upset about the hit. I'd like to see them score another goal and then get back to even strength so the retribution can get on.