Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Sammy Sofa

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    98,224
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    208

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Sammy Sofa

  1. Fukudome Castro Aramis Dunn Soto Byrd Soriano DeWitt Works for me.
  2. And creating a hole. I'm not disagreeing with you, but putting Colvin in RF and signing a 4th OF would alleviate some money issues for a 1B. It downgrades the team too much. They shouldn't have to move Fukudome if they want to sign Dunn. They only have to move Fukudome if they want to sign Dunn AND make unnecessary pitcher signings.
  3. They don't have to spend on much else if they go with Dunn.
  4. Even subtracting the "anything can happen" thinking, you'd still have a team that was competitive for the entire season and actually made the playoffs. That goes much further when it comes to selling merchandise and tickets the following season than a team that farts it's way weakly to the end of the season and was out f it in the summer.
  5. Save the money for what? Even the 88 and out scenario you described would make the Cubs more money in the near future than just "saving it for the farm." Avoiding signing players 30 and up is pointlessly shortsighted. The key is signing the right players who are 30 and up.
  6. There's absolutely no reason to not both focus on improving the farm and improving the team through trades and FA signings. Attempting to do the former at the expense of that latter would just be stupid.
  7. That's a ridiculously simplistic view of how to put together a good team. It's also ridiculous because it would require the Cubs to effectively tank at the ML level for an indefinite period, which would be disaster at this point.
  8. http://www.northsidebaseball.com/forum/topic?f=6&t=58457 So about $116 million? I guess what will be key is how much "slightly less" will be.
  9. So what's the payroll going into 2011 as it stands right now?
  10. That doesn't usually happen, especially with someone who only has 4-5 years of managing experience in the minor leagues.
  11. So then why not just stick to managing in the Cubs' farm system?
  12. Really? All the talk is about them lowering payroll. Not sure if that means from Opening Day last year's number or end of the season number, but either way, adding a $13 million a year player doesn't seem like it fits in the lowering payroll mantra, especially when there's more than one hole on the team. "All the talk" from the organization has been that the payroll will basically stay the same, though I'm still unclear if that means staying the same from what it was last year or "staying the same" after guys like Lilly and Lee were off the books.
  13. HE DOESN'T GET WHAT IT'S LIKE TO BE A CUB, MAAAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNNNN.
  14. http://www.faithmouse.com/michael_jackson_tupac_shakur.jpg
  15. Of course it isn't.
  16. It was 8.4 pounds. Ok the only reason to have that much weed is intent to sell. So he's a hero.
  17. But he rode the bus for four years. FOUR WHOLE YEARS.
  18. It's more of a detriment to the team to sacrifice offensive production at 1B for the sake of defense.
  19. [expletive] that noise. They were damn near crippled by a gruesome twosome 3-4 for most of the first half. Anyone who predicted that is full of [expletive].
  20. Because he likely could have kept coaching in the minors. Why rock that boat? He likely needs significantly more coaching experience under his belt before another team will hire him to manage.
  21. It obviously means that the team underperformed. Oh man; "Cobs."
  22. Oh, good to know he's that bad.
  23. Don't ever do that again.
×
×
  • Create New...