Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Sammy Sofa

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    98,227
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    208

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Sammy Sofa

  1. The Colvin AB was maybe the most predictable thing I've ever seen. I actually felt bad for him.
  2. [expletive], [expletive], THIS COMES DOWN TO COLVIN. Dammit.
  3. Aramis' first 5-hit game of his career. LOVE US, RAMMY. Oh, and Aramis and Soriano both getting hustle doubles? DIE, MEATBALLS.
  4. .293 .330 .395 .725 at home. I agree he usually shouldn't hit higher than 6, but your overreaction is hysterical. He's not an everyday player because of that line? OK then. Straight out of the figures lie and liars figure handbook. Those numbers mean very little when he doesn't hit with men on base. You have to score runs to win and Byrd rarely helps that happen. How anyone can deny his lack of production is mind numbing and hysterically funny. .204/.255/.306 with runners in scoring position this year. You can have him on your team, I prefer a better player. I didn't "deny his lack of production." I've stated numerous times I don't want him batting above 6 in the lineup. That said, your suggestion that he not play everyday is a ridiculous overreaction that seems to be suggesting that the only options are to bench or get rid of him. Why are you opposed to simply batting him lower in the lineup? He's not a completely unproductive hitter and still almost a 2 WAR player despite his struggles this year. He's having a bad year hitting with RISP; so your conclusion is that he's all but useless?
  5. SHHHHHHHHHHH. I'm doing this as hard as I can.
  6. .293 .330 .395 .725 at home. I agree he usually shouldn't hit higher than 6, but your overreaction is hysterical. He's not an everyday player because of that line? OK then.
  7. I for some reason though that although part of his salary was deferred, it was just deferred until the end of this year and would then be included with this years budget. Just basically a way to out off the payment rather than making it equal throughout the year. You may be right though. Yeah, I would hope that it wasn't counted against next year's budget since it has to be paid by January 2012.
  8. I blame UMFan. Bad things happen when he posts. I get up to go take a dump and the Cubs follow suit. I WON'T LET IT HAPPEN AGAIN.
  9. I hope that hustle just gave a thousand meatballs fatal heart attacks.
  10. Hopefully Theo can point out to the Ricketts the importance of spending a lot of money. Part of me is still worried is he's going to try and do this on the (relative) cheap and try and keep the payroll below $120 million.
  11. Oh, Aramis. I will weep if you are not a Cub next year.
  12. Isn't it WAY too soon to be declaring that? Hence the bold. Maybe he'll turn it around. I didn't think he was worth anywhere near what he got before this suck-fest of a season. Holy crap; for some reason I thought he was getting like $110 million.
  13. Isn't it WAY too soon to be declaring that?
  14. Explain. I have a feeling you're inflating the reality of the backloaded contracts they have. If Soriano's was spread out equally they'd be saving, what, a million dollars? If Zambrano's was spread out equally they'd save a few hundred thousand. Who has the contracts where the backloading is specifically hampering the Cubs' spending in the offseason?
  15. That's too bad. I was thinking/hoping things were starting to click for him after the 2009 season.
  16. Nobody is. They're just the cherry on top of a delicious, delicious sundae.
  17. Because guys like Fielder and Pujols are available now and the Cubs can afford them.
×
×
  • Create New...