Sure, but it shouldn't an either/or thing with big contracts; people bizarrely want to give them credit for things they basically ended up being forced to do or not do based on the circumstances of the various Ricketts debacles. The Cubs supposedly really wanted Fielder, so it's not like they were just throwing up sneaky smokescreens to cover their desire to pick up a guy that they had drafted and then basically traded to themselves twice over. And who are we really even laughing at? Oh man, those stupid 44-33 Angels. Oh gee, the Rangers suck this year after 6 straight years of finishing 1st or 2nd and having their gazillion dollar TV deal.