After he was fired, the speculation was that the owner basically controlled the decisionmaking. Still makes it hard to justify the Damon and Beltran trades though. Beltran trade made sense. Astros got a few great months out of him, than he signed on with the Mets at a price that the Royals never could have come close to. Part of the reason why its tough to judge a small market GM. Unless you pumping out a bunch of stud prospects as the Royals are doing now, its not east to put a competitve team together. Who knows how a guy like him or Beane would do with significantly more money at their disposal than they have had in the past. Pretty sure he was talking about the poor returns for Beltran and Damon. The Beltran was especially Hendry-esque IIRC, in that he was determined to get a 3B and a catcher back, limiting what the return could be. The Damon one was I dunno, Dave Littlefield-esque? in that he took back a 36 year old Roberto Hernandez for no apparent reason (Resulting in the trade not even clearing only 1M in salary) and threw in Mark Ellis for good measure. Here's from a Royals blog: