In terms of rankings? All I know about ESPN is that they have decent writeups of all of the commits. More than I would have expected, actually. I meant in terms of quality, maybe even accuracy. Would I be correct in valuing Scout more than ESPN (and of course Rivals more than ESPN). I don't know anything about ESPN's new recruiting team, but they rated Clemson's class No. 2 in the nation when neither Scout nor Rivals had them in the top 10, so I'm going to ignore them for the time being. All the rankings are subjective and can't be judged until 3 or even 4 years down the line. That said, Clemson signed an impressive class. Maybe not #2 overall, but top 5 IMO. Eh, I think ESPN's sucks. They don't rate half the kids, and the ones they do are obviously biased towards the traditional power programs. I'd put Rivals as far and away the number one site, and then Scout, with ESPN a distant number three. But, that's just my opinion.