here's an article with the details: http://sanfrancisco.giants.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/mlb/news/mlb_news.jsp?ymd=20040227&content_id=642185&vkey=news_mlb&fext=.jsp
The cubs paid Hawkins almost $4.5M/year to set up. And Hawkins was easily the best set-up man on the market at the time. And you don't give a guy a raise after a top notch performance as a closer just to make him a set-up guy. If Hendry pulled Dempster from the closer's role after how well he has done, he would look like a real slime to other players, IMO. yup, and this is a different year and a different market. Relief help is at a premium now with so many teams contending so late this season and thinking they will contend next season.
3/$15.5M isn't horrible in this market. 5M per year (roughly) doesn't worry me. the 3 years does. i don't remember any of our bullpen arms performing as advertized for 3 years in a row.
See Hoops' post, they may not be able to afford it. Can anyone see a Todd Walker + good pitching prospect for Brad Radke deal going down? I hope not. Radke's only marginally better than Maddux. Yup. They are statistically very similar. Both have huge K/BB ratios b/c they don't walk many people. Both are susceptible to the long ball and have average BAA. That's not bad, but you'd better not be paying a guy like that upwards of 8M a season. We don't need another salary drain on this team.