I didn't say "historically significant", so save your preposterousity for someone else. I said it has more memories. I should have said, more SIGNIFICANT memories. Some of you may not put much value in the historic significance of winning a baseball championships, but I disagree. Bob Gibson's 17 strikeouts in Game 1 of the '68 World Series comes to mind. Lou Brock's record-setting stolen base. Mark McGwire's record-setting home run. Boston's first World Championship since 1918. The fact that it's parked in the shadow of one of our country's most significant man-made features (the Arch), and just blocks from the Mighty Mississippi. Wrigley or Busch? It may be futile to argue one's significance over the other. They're both memorable, for different reasons. Keep in mind that I didn't start this banter. My point is that it's silly to make a post that implies that there would be reason to cry over Wrigley's demise, but not Busch's. THAT, my friend, is "preposterous". Give me a break. :roll: If you go east towards the river from Busch you have it separated by a parking garage, a bland hotel complex that eats up a whole block, 8 lanes of ugly interstate and the Arch grounds. The Arch grounds are nice and then what do you have on the Mississippi riverfront? A few cars parked on cobblestones and a few lame-a** attractions on barges. Look across the river to East St. Louis Illinois and what do you have? A grain elevator and an ugly casino. Look at Pittsburgh and how great they integrate PNC park with their rivers. Granted the Reds don't have much on the Ohio side of the river. But walk across the bridge over to Covington KY and there are a number of restaurants and bars on the river.