found this posted on the redszone... "Heres Rich Hills stats for the year... *He started in Triple-A and is now in Class A* Triple-A 3.28 ERA, 57.2 Innings, 42 Hits, 21 Earned Runs, 9 Homeruns, 21 Walks, 90 Strike outs. Double-A 4.53 ERA, 43.2 Innings, 35 Hits, 22 Earned Runs, 11 Homeruns, 11 Walks, 62 Strike outs Major Leagues - Cubs 4.76 ERA, 5.2 Innings, 3 Hits, 3 Earned Runs, 3 Walks, 3 Strike outs. Class A 1.13 ERA, 8 Innings, 5 Hits, 1 Earned Run, 12 Strike outs The thing I dont get is how do you start out in Triple-A then go to Double-A then to the Cubs then get sent down to Class A ball? Also hes given up 20 homeruns in a little over 100 innings in the minors." It's amazing how they get the facts screwed up over there..... and another interesting viewpoint... "Rich Hill is not that good, he's NOT. Please, when will people get this. If Hal thinks he is the best prospect in baseball, you have to ask yourself, what the heck does Hal know about prospects?"