Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Prior4CyYoung

Verified Member
  • Posts

    1,596
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Prior4CyYoung

  1. so who offense is more pathetic right now the Reds who cant get guys on or the brewers who like to ground into double plays.
  2. I figured he would walk and let Conine fail miserably.
  3. lets see the reds version of a fake rally.
  4. what the hell cinci you suck
  5. flied out on first pitch
  6. my predications mench walks with bases loaded and thats the winner.
  7. lol not sure if that makes it any better or not lol.
  8. 0-2 on jenkins and you walked him :(
  9. Estrada needs to strike out badly.
  10. Fielder is gonna put them up right here.
  11. should have left Harang in there!
  12. well espn game cast was moving along fine now it seems broke.
  13. well at least griffey will be up next inning for the reds.
  14. well Ross is 2-3 with an HR so maybe he can do it again.
  15. I could see LA, but San Diego? I don't feel too great about seeing Peavy and Young 4 times. Yeah, I think I'd take my chances with LA first as well. Even tough Peavy hasn't been himself lately. If I remember correctly Peavy has really struggled in the playoffs in years past. And Young is well young and unproven in the playoffs. So I am not so sure about rather wanting to face LA over SD.
  16. Using those pitching lines I made my predications. I think the cubs will go 14-6 after that stretch be in first place by at least 2 games. I'll bet you a nickel that the CUBS don't lose all 4 of Jason Marquis' starts during this stretch. LOL I didn't even notice that I had Marquis losing all his games. It wasn't intentional but I guess I just did it sub consciencely.
  17. That rule actually worked out to the Cubs' advantage in 2003. As the third seeded division champion the Cubs should have played the second seeded champion (Giants). But because the top seed (Braves) and wildcard (Marlins) are in the same division the Cubs had to play the top-seeded Braves instead. And we all know how that turned out. Despite that, however, I do agree with your assessment of the rule. It penalizes teams by making them play a higher seed than they should. It worked out for the Cubs in 2003, but it may not next time. We did beat the Braves so in that sense it did work out. But it really makes you wonder what would have happened if the cubs played the giants and the marlins played the braves. The whole bartman incident would have never happened. We may have lost to the giants in the first round but we may have still beaten them and maybe the braves beat the marlins and then we beat the braves. These are all hypothetical but I do wish they didn't have that rule in place because it does kinda screw the top teams.
  18. hmm all those L and W were lined up when I sent it and now there all over the place o well whatever.
  19. Using those pitching lines I made my predications. I think the cubs will go 14-6 after that stretch be in first place by at least 2 games.
  20. ya I watched that on ESPN it was really crazy game.
  21. I was gonna guess Shawn Estes or Glendon Rusch.
×
×
  • Create New...