There are few offensive upgrades out there in the FA market, and even if you sign one of them, you're right back to status quo, really. You'd have to sign 2 good offensive players if you deal Aramis But you also wouldn't have to worry about getting another SP because of Santana. It's a pretty big risk, but if you feel that Ramirez is likely to opt out, I'd be real tempted to do it and insert myself in a deal for Ensberg. or like you said earlier, maybe he opts out for more money, in which case you make another run at signing Aram this is interesting in that the prevailing sentiment as that the O's are nuts for not trading Tejada for these two players, but the Cubs would be nuts to trade Aram for these two players. Tejada is at least 4 years older, has a more onerous contract and has been roughly as productive as Aramis has been over the last 3 or so seasons. Tejada will decline as he finishes out his contract. Baltimore is going nowhere as they stand, so why not use a player that's older and only going to get worse to inject youth into your team? Conversely, Aramis is 28, in his prime, productive provided he has some sembalance of lineup protection, and even if he renegotiates his deal for $15m, is still a better value than Tejada. I'm not sure where you're getting the information about their ages. I have 5/25/76 for Tejada and 6/25/78 for Aram. Tejada may decline. Aram is a much bigger injury risk. Contracts are Aram at 3 for 33+M OR nothing but draft picks if he opts out. Tejada is 3 at 38. Tejada's VORP I'm sure is gigantic because he plays a defensive position, Aram's probably low considering he plays a power position. I'm not sure I would do either trade. I just think these are two extremely comparable players, yet general sentiment, perhaps by different people, is the exact opposite on whether the trade would be good or bad.