I think there is some middle ground where a player who is not a superstar (yet) has to decide on security vs risk. It's up to the individual. If I were a player who was really good and didn't have Boars as an agent, I would use him. But If I were a regular player, not an all-star, I don't know that I would use Boras.
I don't think the point of the article was to say that Boars is bad for baseball, but to point out that the model is evolving. We will see what happens wth the CBA. Tom's post is not wrong, it's merely annoyingly written in his jazz scat way.