Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Cubs News & Analysis

    What Do the 2026 Chicago Cubs Still Need?

    And don't say more pitching depth.

    Matthew Trueblood
    Image courtesy of © Benny Sieu-Imagn Images

    Cubs Video

    The hot stove is burning itself out in a blaze of glory. In the last week, a flurry of moves has drawn down the list of truly impactful free agents to just two or three names. Trades have sent frontline starters Freddy Peralta and MacKenzie Gore and talented outfielder Luis Robert Jr. to new clubs. What was fluid for a long time appears increasingly concrete. The contenders and the pretenders are separating themselves much more clearly.

    After their acquisitions of Edward Cabrera and Alex Bregman this month, the Cubs are very much on the contender side of the divide. However, they insist that they're not done tinkering with their roster, and indeed, we can survey the likely Opening Day corps and see places where upgrades are still possible. Here's how I'd rank the team's remaining needs, a few weeks out from the beginning of spring training.

    1. A reliable left-handed batter, ideally with positional flexibility.
    That's a lot to ask for, in the endgame of the offseason. Worse, the Cubs are likely to ask such a player to accept a roving role that comes up short of everyday playing time, so it's very hard to imagine them both acquiring such a player and keeping them happy. If it were possible, though, it would be awfully nice. Michael Busch is the only left-handed hitter on the roster who has proved he can consistently hammer right-handed pitching. Ian Happ is a de facto second threat, as a switch-hitter, but the uncertainty around Pete Crow-Armstrong and Moisés Ballesteros makes bringing in one more solid lefty bat somewhat important.

    Don't expect that player to be Luis Arraez. He's still a free agent, but he has very little defensive utility and his game has become a caricature of itself at the plate. He never strikes out, but doesn't hit the ball hard very often, either. Switch-hitter Luis Rengifo could be in the right price range, coming off a disastrous walk year with the Angels after three good ones. He's always been a better hitter from the right side of the plate, though. A trade could unearth just the right player, like Luis García of the Nationals or Hyeseong Kim of the Dodgers, but it's easy to overpay when trying to fill a highly specific need in the trade market. Wary of that, Jed Hoyer and his team might elect to wait and see how urgent this need is come July, by which time enough progress from Ballesteros and/or Crow-Armstrong could obviate it.

    2. One More Starter
    This has been discussed at length in all corners of Cubdom over the last two weeks, but even with an ostensible six-man rotation and Javier Assad, Ben Brown and Jordan Wicks able to start the season stretched out in Iowa, the team needs more quality depth in the rotation. That's why they're still interested in Zac Gallen, and will be only slightly less so in pitchers like Nick Martinez and Zack Littell if Gallen signs elsewhere. Injuries are coming for their incumbent starters.

    Filling this need via trade would be optimal, again, because it would allow them to target a controllable hurler who can be optioned to the minors. If they can find an opportunity to get better and more left-handed on the bench, trading Matt Shaw for a starter who can start the season in the minors would be in play. The team now has three players (Kevin Alcántara, Justin Dean and newly signed Chas McCormick, coming to camp on a minor-league deal) vying for the backup outfielder slot on the roster. Shaw's work in the outfield in Arizona this month is for show, to keep him mollified and to entice potential trade partners.

    3. High-Octane Bullpen Help
    Though they're a bit roster-locked after signing four veterans to big-league deals and needing to stash Colin Rea in the pen for some stretches, the Cubs have depth and optionality in the bullpen. If they're going to make any further moves there, it should be for a no-doubt difference-maker, and it's not at all clear that such a player is available right now. The free-agent market for relievers has run dry, partially thanks to the Cubs. They have a bunch of optionable arms on the 40-man roster, and a bunch more interesting minor-league signees. Unless the Padres are desperate to clear some payroll and want to trade one of the electric arms in their bullpen, the Cubs should just roll into camp with what they have.

    These needs don't mesh all that well with the market. What's available is more along the lines of positionless right-handed hitters like Miguel Andujar. The fact that he's available is the best reason anyone can muster for why the Cubs have been tied to him. He's not a fit for them. Nor are most of the low-wattage starters left out there. The Twins would like to trade lefty-batting Trevor Larnach, but he can only play left field or DH, so the Cubs would have to be very confident in Shaw as a multi-tool off the bench to deal for Larnach. The Giants keep calling about Nico Hoerner, but their offers aren't getting any better. 

    It's probably true that the Cubs will make one or two more moves before spring training begins. The smart money, though, says that they'll be inconsequential, and probably unsuccessful. Chicago has had a good offseason. They might be out of ways to reasonably improve for 2026, without destabilizing the rest of what they've assembled.

    Follow North Side Baseball For Chicago Cubs News & Analysis

    Recent Cubs Articles

    Recent Cubs Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    Clark_Addison

    Posted

    Bullpen does NOT have optionality

    Palencia - not going down unless he is bad.  Maton, Harvey, Thielbar, Webb, Milner, Rea don't have options and that is 6 guys for 8 spots with Palencia likely not going anywhere that is 7 of 8 spots where you need an IL stint to open a spot.

     

    The last spot is it. Assad could take that spot or start everyday in Iowa. Brown, Hodge, Hollowell, Little, Martin, Neely, Roberts, Rolison, Wicks are the other 40 man guys and have options but only 1 spot there. IF, they add a SP they will be locked without injuries on the pitching staff. All that means is if one of the guys without options is bad they get released. But they will let a guy go longer before releasing than they would if they get optioned.  

    But no way this pitching staff has optionality going. It is actually just the opposite. 

    • Like 1
    Michael Trzinski

    Posted

    36 minutes ago, Clark_Addison said:

    Bullpen does NOT have optionality.

    I think he meant that the bullpen has many options (different pitchers to choose from), not that the pitchers have minor league options.

    The Cubs have a glorious gallimaufry of 'pen personnel.

    Bertz

    Posted

    I think the closest thing to a full on need is another reliever.  I would like to go into the season with four guys i feel comfortable with in a leverage spot on day 1.  We currently have three in Harvey, Maton, and Palencia.  Thielbar was great last year, and despite his age ZiPS still likes him, but back against the wall I still view him as a platoon guy who's adequate against RHH.

    I'd love another LHH outfielder.  Basically the best guy willing to take a minor league deal (something in the Max Kepler range?).  I was big on dealing Owen Caissie because he was pretty superfluous on this roster.  However if god forbid Happ or Suzuki go down for an extended time I would like someone who can provide some support to whatever combo of Alcantara/Shaw/Long/Austin ends up providing the primary backfill.

    The rotation...I am torn between wanting to maintain depth and between wishing we could disappear Taillon and have a competition for the 5th starter spot.  Adding Gallen would be fun too, but even there IMO it should be essentially a Gallen/Taillon trade.  The team has a good bit of depth on hand, even with inevitable injury I wouldn't find a lot of value in cramming another veteran swing guy like Nick Martinez onto the MLB roster.  I frankly think that would hurt the pen more than it'd help the rotation.  

    • Like 1
    Victor Reichman

    Posted

    Shaw can play 3B, SS, and 2B. Perhaps also in the OF as he certainly has the speed and hand eye coordination. It would be absolutely foolhardy to trade him as he has untapped potential.

    He is 2nd fastest behind PCA, tremendous defensively, hit 10 HR just in 2nd half and just needs to work on contact. When Tucker bombed in the 2nd half and post season, Shaw was there with offense and defense. Our IF and OF won us the Gold Glove for teams. Nico was our best player and it's shameful that he didn't make the 100 best players with his speed, defense and 2nd in BA in NL. He deserves an extension if he is willing. If not, Shaw will plug in nicely. We have enough to win, except perhaps against LAD.



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...