Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • The Evolution of Christopher Morel and the Clutch Moment


    Matt Ostrowski

    In two telling plate appearances late in games this week, we saw what the Cubs' most compelling young hitter still needs to work on--and what he's already doing at an exceptional level.

    Image courtesy of © Kevin Sousa-USA TODAY Sports

    Cubs Video

    Christopher Morel stepped to the plate on Wednesday night with the game on the line. With runners on second and third, one out, and a one-run deficit in the ninth inning, the Chicago Cubs just needed some decent contact in order to at least extend the game against the New York Mets.

    Unfortunately for the Cubs, other than Patrick Wisdom, I am not sure there is a worse player to have coming to the plate when all you need is contact. Morel’s 33% strikeout rate is third-worst among rostered Cubs, behind Wisdom’s 37.5% (yikes) and the seldom-used Tucker Barnhart, at 33.1%. 

    That is exactly how the at-bat played out. After swinging through two fastballs to fall behind 0-2, Morel took another fastball for a ball; fouled off another; and then took a fifth straight fastball right down the middle for strike three.

    With a player like Morel, you learn to take the good with the bad. Thankfully, Cubs fans have recent experience with that, after having Javier Baez on the team for several years. Despite the high strikeout rate, Morel’s wRC+ of 129 is third on the Cubs, behind Cody Bellinger and just one point behind newcomer Jeimer Candelario, according to FanGraphs. Morel’s 91.9 miles-per-hour average exit velocity is second to Wisdom, and his .257 isolated power also trails Wisdom for the team lead. All of this is to say that, despite the strikeouts, Morel is a very productive hitter.

    It was the way that Morel struck out that was particularly frustrating for Cubs fans. It was a straight fastball! Right down the middle! It struck me, while watching the game, that it feels like that happens to Morel more than any player I consistently watch. As a matter of fact, it had happened to him just two innings prior!

    Per FanGraphs, he is swinging at 68.2 percent of fastballs in the strike zone. For reference, Yan Gomes, one of the more aggressive hitters on the team, swings at 71 percent of fastballs in the zone, which is a decent but not significant difference. So, maybe there is nothing to this.

    Or, maybe there is. Morel’s 44.4% swing-and-miss rate against four-seam fastballs is ninth-worst in baseball, according to Baseball Savant. His 45.1% strikeout rate against four-seamers is 17th-worst. 

    Obviously, hitters typically hit fastballs well, and struggle against offspeed pitches. While Morel just swings and misses a lot in general, and his 45.7% swing-and-miss rate against sliders is still bad, it is only 43rd-worst in baseball. His 24.4% strikeout rate against sliders is all the way down at 304th-worst in baseball. That section of the leaderboard is populated by contact hitters like Nolan Arenado, Tommy Edman, and Nico Hoerner–not somewhere you’d expect to find someone like Morel.

    So what gives? Per Baseball Savant, Morel is slugging .925 against sliders this year, first in all of baseball. His peripherals back that up as well, as his expected slugging percentage of .725 is fourth in baseball. His in-zone swing percentage against sliders is up about seven percentage points from last year to this year, according to FanGraphs, a fairly significant difference. He is also crushing cutters, which is the closest relative to a slider as far as pitch shape. Is he sitting on pitches that he thinks will break a certain way, causing him to take more straight fastballs for strike three?

    Maybe it’s all just statistical noise. His performance against these pitches last year was not nearly as impressive as it is this year, and he is still struggling against curveballs and sweepers. And he did jump a first-pitch sinker for a lead off home run earlier in the same game. Tellingly, in clinching a .500 road trip for the team on Saturday, he stroked a go-ahead double in a clutch ninth-inning moment, when Blue Jays reliever Jordan Hicks threw him a slider. In the modern version of MLB, there are worse approaches than going up there sitting on a slider and knowing when it will end up in the zone. 

    Or maybe it is something. His improvement from last year to this year is at least evident in his peripherals. “Let Christopher be Christopher” doesn’t nearly have the same ring to it as “let Javy be Javy” did. But as frustrating as that ninth-inning at-bat in Queens was, maybe that’s just the best approach as a fan: Take the good with the bad, and enjoy the ride.

    Think you could write a story like this? North Side Baseball wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    MORE FROM NORTH SIDE BASEBALL
    — Latest Cubs coverage from our writers
    — Recent Cubs discussion in our forums
    — Follow NSBB via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a North Side Baseball Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    He's still learning and has shown great adjustments at the plate already. His defense has taken a big step backward. Not everybody can be Ben Zobrist. Unfortunately, his best position is 2nd and we have locked in Nico.  if it came down to it, I'd rather trade Nico than Morel. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, CubinNY said:

    He's still learning and has shown great adjustments at the plate already. His defense has taken a big step backward. Not everybody can be Ben Zobrist. Unfortunately, his best position is 2nd and we have locked in Nico.  if it came down to it, I'd rather trade Nico than Morel. 

    I disagree.  Nico is the unsung hero of this team.  Morel certainly has a higher ceiling but throw in a ton of strikeouts and horrible defense and I think Nico is what this team needs.  Morel is a DH/corner OF.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, Backtobanks said:

    I disagree.  Nico is the unsung hero of this team.  Morel certainly has a higher ceiling but throw in a ton of strikeouts and horrible defense and I think Nico is what this team needs.  Morel is a DH/corner OF.

    I submit that Nico has been the sung hero along with Bellinger. And that Morel has been the unsung hero. Give him reps at one position. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 minutes ago, Backtobanks said:

    I disagree.  Nico is the unsung hero of this team.  Morel certainly has a higher ceiling but throw in a ton of strikeouts and horrible defense and I think Nico is what this team needs.  Morel is a DH/corner OF.

    Yeah, Hoerner’s got his flaws but this is a dramatically worse team and defense swapping him for Morel. Sure they gain some nominal offense, but with DH defense 

    I’m happy to take the good with the bad in 2023 with Morel but probably would “look” to “Sell High” this offseason for a SP or an upgrade on offense 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 minutes ago, TomtheBombadil said:

    I’m happy to take the good with the bad in 2023 with Morel but probably would “look” to “Sell High” this offseason for a SP or an upgrade on offense 

    This is where I'm landing with Morel at the moment.  I don't get the sense that Morel can Zobrist his way into being a superutility type of player who can play across the MIF and in the OF while still keeping up his end of the bargain at the plate.  So, on the other side of the equation, he may need to man a single position in the hopes that the everyday reps will improve his defense at that position.  However, he's currently blocked at 2B and across the OF, his odds of sticking at 3B don't seem so great, and 2024 likely won't have an everyday opening for him unless the Cubs pull some serious offseason moves.

    So, you end up with a situation where Morel might be more valuable to another team than to the Cubs come the offseason.  In that scenario, he'd be better served as trade bait, instead of the Cubs trying to smash a square peg into a round hole.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, CubinNY said:

    He's still learning and has shown great adjustments at the plate already. His defense has taken a big step backward. Not everybody can be Ben Zobrist. Unfortunately, his best position is 2nd and we have locked in Nico.  if it came down to it, I'd rather trade Nico than Morel. 

    I never thought Zobrist was above average at any position he played in the field, I think that gets overplayed in the media and by fans.  In fact IMHO he was mediocre as an outfielder and while reliable at second his range was lacking compared to those he was replacing.  I remember screaming about it during games back then.  But yes, Morel has not improved at any of the defensive positions he's played outside of second base and Zobrist was a better defender as a veteran player here at positions they both played than Morel is now at the tender age of 24. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Outshined_One said:

    This is where I'm landing with Morel at the moment.  I don't get the sense that Morel can Zobrist his way into being a superutility type of player who can play across the MIF and in the OF while still keeping up his end of the bargain at the plate.  So, on the other side of the equation, he may need to man a single position in the hopes that the everyday reps will improve his defense at that position.  However, he's currently blocked at 2B and across the OF, his odds of sticking at 3B don't seem so great, and 2024 likely won't have an everyday opening for him unless the Cubs pull some serious offseason moves.

    So, you end up with a situation where Morel might be more valuable to another team than to the Cubs come the offseason.  In that scenario, he'd be better served as trade bait, instead of the Cubs trying to smash a square peg into a round hole.

    With as much progression as Morel has shown in the brief time he's been on the big team if they trade him, it better be for top quality. I'm talking about a top-20 prospect or an established guy. 

    He's barely a year into his career and already showing tremendous progress. I don't believe he's always going to be a high strike-out guy. He's not Javy. 

    Edited by CubinNY
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, CubinNY said:

    With as much progression as Morel has shown in the brief time, he's been on the big team if they trade him it better for top quality. I'm talking about a top-20 prospect or an established guy. 

    He's barely a year into his career and already showing tremendous progress. I don't believe he's always going to be a high strike-out guy. He's not Javy. 

    He's in the first percentile (1%) for whiff rate, and that has gotten worse for non-fastballs this year v. last.  I think he has enough patience to be a useful hitter, but I don't see him making dramatic improvements to the K's.  Combined with his defensive regression(or if you prefer, exposure of his defensive limitations) it's harder for me to see a path to him being a demonstrably better player than he is today.  What he is today is plenty useful, but also is probably a prime opportunity to use to make upgrades elsewhere if you need to pull from the MLB roster.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    34 minutes ago, CubUgly said:

    I never thought Zobrist was above average at any position he played in the field, I think that gets overplayed in the media and by fans.  In fact IMHO he was mediocre as an outfielder and while reliable at second his range was lacking compared to those he was replacing.  I remember screaming about it during games back then.  But yes, Morel has not improved at any of the defensive positions he's played outside of second base and Zobrist was a better defender as a veteran player here at positions they both played than Morel is now at the tender age of 24. 

    35+ Zobrist may have slipped a little on defense, but he was one of the very best all around players in the game during his day. There was a small window he was *the* guy every Tom, Dick, and Harry Prospect got compared to if they just happened to play multiple positions, is pretty much the modern prototype for a ballplayer. Even without his defense, the plate approach was as good as the league got for some time and Morel’s doesn’t compare

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    26 minutes ago, Transmogrified Tiger said:

    He's in the first percentile (1%) for whiff rate, and that has gotten worse for non-fastballs this year v. last.  I think he has enough patience to be a useful hitter, but I don't see him making dramatic improvements to the K's.  Combined with his defensive regression(or if you prefer, exposure of his defensive limitations) it's harder for me to see a path to him being a demonstrably better player than he is today.  What he is today is plenty useful, but also is probably a prime opportunity to use to make upgrades elsewhere if you need to pull from the MLB roster.

    I see a kid who is learning and getting better at recognizing pitches. He has plenty of room for improvement as you noted. He's not swinging wildly at balls in the dirt or showing he's made his mind up to swing no matter what. I think it's easy to put him into a box given where he's from and his profile to date, but I think there is more and better to come from him. I'd hate to see the Cubs trade him and then watch him turn into a perennial all-star.

    Just in case: I'm bookmarking this page. LOL

    Edited by CubinNY
    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yeah Zobrist is a pretty unfair comparison for anyone. 

    Morel has a 125 wRC. Zobrist bested that three times, in a four year stretch where he put up a 152, 100, 130, and a 137 (2009-2012). In those 4 years he was the second best offensive player in baseball, which was also aided by pretty fantastic defensive numbers. The Zobrist we got familiar with (124, 83, 123, 83 again in his last (lost) year, although obviously much more OBP heavy vs Morels SLG) is probably closer to what you would hope for from Morel.

    I don't think there's enough out there to close the book on him defensively....he seems like a great athlete who has made a significant leap offensively in the last couple years, it's hard for me to imagine he's totally unplayable out there on a permanent basis. Speed is 79th percentile, arm strength is 99th. 

    Certainly a flawed player, but I don't think you write him off as positionless at this point. 5 more years of control and his ability to hit the ball incredibly hard frequently is too valuable.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    30 minutes ago, squally1313 said:

    I don't think there's enough out there to close the book on him defensively....he seems like a great athlete who has made a significant leap offensively in the last couple years, it's hard for me to imagine he's totally unplayable out there on a permanent basis. Speed is 79th percentile, arm strength is 99th. 

    I think he can probably become a decent corner OF with repetition.  He hasn't spent a ton of pro time there and his issues there have been more on the route-running variety than tripping over his feet.  On the infield though, I dunno.  Yes he has pro experience and a cannon for an arm, but I don't know if the hands are there to be anything but below average.  Errors aren't everything but I think they're probably emblematic of the disconnect between potential and production that we're describing.  As a minor leaguer he had 28 errors in 84 games at SS, 39 errors in 156 games at 3B, and 0 errors in only 13 games at 2B.  He doesn't strike me as *incapable* of making progress, but I can't bet a major league roster spot on it.

    So then I'm left with a guy who's below average defensively on the IF and maybe an okay defender in RF/LF with time, but that's not a great roster fit for a team that has prioritized defense and doesn't have corner OF playing time to spare.  No issue keeping him as a DH and occasional position player, but I think the risk of the K rate/approach imploding on him are greater than him figuring out how to play a useful defensive role in this Cubs roster.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    20 minutes ago, Transmogrified Tiger said:

    I think he can probably become a decent corner OF with repetition.  He hasn't spent a ton of pro time there and his issues there have been more on the route-running variety than tripping over his feet.  On the infield though, I dunno.  Yes he has pro experience and a cannon for an arm, but I don't know if the hands are there to be anything but below average.  Errors aren't everything but I think they're probably emblematic of the disconnect between potential and production that we're describing.  As a minor leaguer he had 28 errors in 84 games at SS, 39 errors in 156 games at 3B, and 0 errors in only 13 games at 2B.  He doesn't strike me as *incapable* of making progress, but I can't bet a major league roster spot on it.

    So then I'm left with a guy who's below average defensively on the IF and maybe an okay defender in RF/LF with time, but that's not a great roster fit for a team that has prioritized defense and doesn't have corner OF playing time to spare.  No issue keeping him as a DH and occasional position player, but I think the risk of the K rate/approach imploding on him are greater than him figuring out how to play a useful defensive role in this Cubs roster.

    Are we 100% certain he wouldn’t be a more productive LF or RF than Happ or Suzuki if he was dropped in there full-time? Not saying the Cubs should be doing that but I don’t think Morel is the guy that should be immediately written off here. 

    Edited by matto1233
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, matto1233 said:

    Are we 100% certain he wouldn’t be a more productive LF or RF than Happ or Suzuki if he was dropped in there full-time? Not saying the Cubs should be doing that but I don’t think Morel is the guy that should be immediately written off here. 

    I don't think it's very likely the Cubs give him the dozens(hundreds?) of reps in corner OF that it would take to find out.  I especially don't think they're going to look at Morel's performance this year and decide that getting rid of Happ(who has an NTC) or Suzuki in order to find out is the best way forward.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, TomtheBombadil said:

    35+ Zobrist may have slipped a little on defense, but he was one of the very best all around players in the game during his day. There was a small window he was *the* guy every Tom, Dick, and Harry Prospect got compared to if they just happened to play multiple positions, is pretty much the modern prototype for a ballplayer. Even without his defense, the plate approach was as good as the league got for some time and Morel’s doesn’t compare

     

     

    the only Zobrist I know of is the one 35+ one who played for the Cubs, never saw him enough to judge before but I saw him enough for form an opinion of him defensively after and this was my observation.   I have no reason to doubt your high praise pre-Cub days and I have nothing but respect for Zobrist contribution.  I just think the degree to which his defensive prowess at multiple positions "As a CUB" is a bit exaggerated and overplayed.   

    And if you care to see I conceded even the past his defensive prime Zobrist was better defensively than Morel, and I never compared their bats. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...