Way to slay the strawman. Care to link me to a single post in the history of this board where someone opined that experience is irrelevant? All other things being equal, I'll take the more experienced guy. But major league baseball teams generally overemphasize "experience." So when there's actually a decision between an experienced guy and an inexpercinced guy, rarely are "all other things equal." (If they were, the inexperienced guy wouldn't even be considered) And I'll take the more talented, inexperienced guy every.single.time. Uh, people say that on this board all the time. Link? People say inexperience is vastly overvalued. And it is. I've yet to see anyone make a serious case for experience being irrelevant. Here's your link: viewtopic.php?t=44592 And btw, just because people don't use the word irrelevant, doesn't mean they don't think it is. If someone says experience is not a factor (which the link will show), that is the same as saying it is relevant. Something that is not a factor, is irrelevant -- same thing. Listen, I'm not here to prove or disprove what people said about certain things. Most of the posters on this board, do not really value experience. I do. I think it is an intangible. No, you cannot objectively measure it, but it is a factor. I think it was a factor with Marmol last night. Hopefully, he got the butterfly's out of the way and he'll be dominant from here on out.