there are many,many choices! a lot will be decided by who is signed or can be signed. if get a furcal type for lead off then we probably need 2 hitters in the outfield. i like murton but you can not have 2 outfielders with little power at wrigley. especially if the guy you are counting on for power is corey(see:2005) i really reggie sanders, he is very consistent regardless of where he plays. he is always supposed to be a good teammate. he could be signed for 1 or possibly years not real expensive. last year was the 1st year he signed a two year deal. that would be a good time table for our young outfielders to develop. we definitely would know what corey had, and hopefully pie and murton would be ready. if we went with cedeno or furcal at short we would need another ofer. it could be huff or giles, trades are tough to guess on because you never know who is available. we must upgrade from burnitz. you can not be a playoff team iif he is your best offensive outfielder. i am torn on nomar. i like him. i want to be healthy. i might resign him to a cheap incentive laden contract. there really isn't much out there so that may mean you gamble. if he goes down again...i go with cedeno at at least until trading deadline. if nomar has an incentive deal you would have some cash to play with for a deal. if you sign nomar you must sign a lead off man at 2nd or of. i certainly hope everyone has seen that a lead off hitter is a necessity. corey can not do it and if they are even considering pie for it then he better do it the rest of the year and maybe next in the minors. one thought is a trade with washington. they have several options at 2nd. vidro has been hurt and is more expensive perhaps they would deal him. he is good offensive player and would have to be positive he could lead off, and i personally do not know enough about him to be sure. bullpen needs help. however, i think they are only an arm or two away from being solid. we have a closer in dempster. my next thought is put woody in that role the rest of the year. see if he can do it then that ups his trade value. at 12 mil a year he has to either be a healthy-good starter or a closer(or traded). it would be easier to swallow the 12 mil if he was a great closer, rather than a set up man. it would also keep dempster's value down a little for resigning. we should know if williamson can be the right handed set up guy, if so..all we need is a tough lefty set up man. we would need to spend a bit. you then habe ohman as a loogie, welmeyer,mitre and wuertz as possibly the bullpen. there should be a good battle for these spots. dare i say, it could actually be a strength? starters for the first time in resent history is a huge problem. you have 2 studs z-prior. what happens with wood/maddux means a lot. if either is not in the rotation, we must sign someone and someone preety good. burnett, schmidt, mulder...it has to be a top 3 kinda guy. we do not have the studs to think that any of our young guys can be a top 3. williams might be ok as an end of the rotation guy but not 3. same with rusch-although i think he is gone if he is not a starter. hill is not looking good but we might as well watch the rest of the season- we will have a good idea then. if wood and maddux are gone..there would be 21 mil to sign some help. if they are there, you can not afford to sign more help. so it's hoping that wood is healthy and maddux can hang on for 1 more decent year. then williams is probably your 5, maybe hill.