Stanford is 69, Iowa is 81. Those are their two worst losses. Ahhh it's because we're using Pomeroy/Sagarin ratings and not the RPI. I know that Pomeroy and Sagarin are better measures of how good a team is than the RPI, but RPI is what the committee uses. That's why NW isn't getting as much hype as Tennessee. In honesty, I use Sagarin because they already have most of the factors calculated, minimal effort to generate the anonymous comparisons. :) R/N record I grab from Pomeroy, last 12 I quickly eyeball from Pomeroy (since red = loss and green = win). Even with the RPI site I linked, none of the calculations are pre-made. Pomeroy has a fantastic "nitty gritty" page on each team, and Sagarin has good quick and dirty SOS and top 25/top 50 records. Also, yes, I like Pomeroy and Sagarin as better measures of how good a team is, but RPI and Sagarin's ELO are better measures of how "accomplished" a team is. The RPI is not Northwestern's friend right now. I was able to find a breakdown like you have on the team page, something called selection sheet or something like that. I can't get to it now since I'm not a member, they only let you see a couple of teams as a preview, I guess.