If Soriano is really an adequate CF then by all means Pie should be traded while his value is high. LF is an easy position to fill and Soriano's offense is far more valuable coming from CF. People who say positions are unimportant don't understand the economics involved. How valuable would Pujols be if he played CF? Certainly more valuable than at 1B or LF. Define "valuable". Like as in trade value? Soriano's not getting traded. And his value on the FA market is obviously irrelevant now. Soriano does not have more value to the Cubs as a CF, if they're sold on Pie. Similarly, Pujols is not getting traded, and he doesn't have value to the Cards as a CF (or at least hasn't in the past), because of Edmonds. For Soriano to have value as a CF to the Cubs, you'd need to find a trade involving Pie that nets a LF that's better than Pie, both offensively and defensively. Only then would the Cubs be better off as a team with Soriano in CF. Value is production (and salary) relative to average for the position. There are a lot of LF'ers who hit at near the level Soriano does, but there are few CF'ers, and even fewer 2B. So when he is in LF the Cubs are paying him an enormous sum to be not that far above average for the position. Offensively, Alsonso would be an elite CF, but not so with LF. So the Cubs would be that much better by switching Pie to LF and Soriano to CF (as Garwilly suggested earlier)? The point is, the same 8 guys hitting in the same spots in the lineup are going to generate the same number of runs regardless of where each one stands when it's the Cubs' turn in the field. So if playing Soriano in CF allows you to upgrade from Pie to someone better (considering hitting, baserunning, defense, age, salary, etc etc), then having Soriano play CF provides value *to the Cubs*. Short of that though, this whole discussion of "value" is off base. There's no value unless/until it enables a better and/or cheaper option to be plugged into the lineup (and they don't come any cheaper than Pie). Just want to make sure it was clear I was being searcastic. Go on..