Yeah, the thing is: Almora hitting for power has never been a thing. Nobody expected it. Nobody was hitching their wagons to him because they thought he might hit for power. He doesn't need to hit for power to be an effective major league ballplayer. I am not worried about his power, because I never expected him to hit for power. Maybe I thought he would hit for a little more power than he has. But I never soured on him because of his lack of power. I soured on him because he couldn't get on base, for a couple of reasons: 1. He rarely walked. 2. He didn't hit very well. If he can show more discipline, wait for pitches he can drive (even if it's only into a gap for a double, or on a line for a single), and get on base, then he becomes intriguing again. Albert Almora with a 4% BB% is kinda ugly. Albert Almora with an 8-10% walk rate is somewhat exciting. Albert Almora with a .250 ISO is basically Mike Trout. I am not expecting Mike Trout, so I don't care that he doesn't have a .250 ISO. But, back to how this started: Yes, I get it, he doesn't hit for power. That is something about him that is not good. And pointing it out isn't something that I would find exasperating. I just think that citing his SLG% 6 games into the season is absurd.