Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Aaron Kennelly

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    11,503
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Trade & Free Agent Rumors

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospect Rankings

Chicago Cubs News, Rumors & Analysis

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Chicago Cubs Fan Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Aaron Kennelly

  1. Zagunis is starting to get hot. BABIP and K% both trending the right way.
  2. I forgot to mention, but when I saw South Bend when Cease was pitching on Friday, Paredes hit the ball really hard three times, with nothing to show for it. He pulled one down the line that hit off the wall. The umpire called it foul, but it looked fair from my vantage point. In his next AB, he ripped another one down the line that hooked barely foul at the last moment. And his last AB he flew out to the track in center. To follow up, he looked really sharp in the field. He made a tough play ranging a ways towards third and then turning a DP to prevent the tying run from scoring. I still don't think he can stay at short; he's freaking huge already. And he didn't show good speed running the bases. But I can see why they have him there for now. And even if he does move, he looks like he could be a solid defender anywhere else.
  3. I forgot to mention, but when I saw South Bend when Cease was pitching on Friday, Paredes hit the ball really hard three times, with nothing to show for it. He pulled one down the line that hit off the wall. The umpire called it foul, but it looked fair from my vantage point. In his next AB, he ripped another one down the line that hooked barely foul at the last moment. And his last AB he flew out to the track in center.
  4. Does Greinke's velocity loss worry anyone, or is that just something we're immune to now?
  5. The Schwarber non-walk was just a new way to prove that I've cursed him.
  6. Greinke's been great this year. But his velo is way down. Struggling to get over 90. He'd fit right in.
  7. I'm just going to hang out in here for awhile.
  8. The answer is, indubitably, yes. http://www.northsidebaseball.com/articles/cubs-articles/51-have-i-cursed-kyle-schwarber
  9. On April 17, I wrote an article titled "Kyle Schwarber is Breaking Out." At the time, Schwarber was hitting .244/.393/.444. Since then, Schwarber has hit .151/.270/.302 in 100 PA. Real ground-breaking analysis I'm providing here at NSBB. You'd be well within your rights to call this Fake News. There are only two explanations that make sense here: Either Kyle Schwarber was not breaking out or... I've cursed him. The first explanation is plausible. It was only a couple weeks into the season. That's a little early for me to be making such boastful proclamations. The second explanation is also plausible. The Kennellys have terrible luck. It's quite likely that Kyle Schwarber is accursed because of my bad luck rubbing off on him. I have a friend, Matt, who has amazing luck. Matt's name was once drawn out at a fundraiser raffle for $10,000 while he was away at a casino winning thousands of other dollars. I'm pretty much the exact opposite of that. Let's just assume that Schwarber has been blighted by my article. The thing is, I still think he's going to break out. I feel safe saying this because you can't kill what's already dead. Let's split Schwarber's season into three segments: Pre-cursed Kyle, Bad Kyle, and Unlucky Kyle. Pre-cursed Kyle had been having a decent season. That .393 OBP looks really good in retrospect. The premise of my first article was that Schwarber should have been doing even better, though. His K% was at 33.9% despite his Contact% being up to 75.8%. I intimated that his K% would drop significantly if he kept making contact like that. In fact, it has. His K% is down to 27.6% for the season. He's struck out in 24% of his PA since I wrote that article. His Contact% has even went up since then -- to 77.1% for the season. To spare me what little dignity I still have, I was correct about the K%. What I couldn't have foreseen was that Kyle Schwarber would quit hitting like Kyle Schwarber. This is where Bad Kyle comes into the picture. After the game on May 1, I posted in the NSBB game thread about a sudden funk (*cough* curse *cough*) Schwarber had went into: It looks like his funk has been going on since about April 23rd. On the 22nd, he went 0-3, but he walked twice and the two balls he put in play were line drives hit at least 104 mph. He had an .818 OPS after that game. From April 23 through that May 1 game, Schwarber hit .121/.194/.121. His Contact% was down a little and his O-Swing% was up a little. But, it wasn't too bad. He was still showing pretty good plate discipline. The problem was with the kind of contact Schwarber was making. Pre-cursed Kyle (from April 2 through April 22) had a 90.3 mph average exit velocity. Bad Kyle (from April 23 through May 1) had a 76.3 mph average exit velocity. Pre-cursed Kyle had an average launch angle of 19.5°. Bad Kyle had an average launch angle of 6.9°. Bad Kyle simply wasn't hitting the ball hard enough. And he wasn't getting it elevated enough. Since 2015, Kyle Hendricks' average exit velocity, while batting, is 74.2 mph. When Bad Kyle put the ball in play, he was doing it as Kyle Hendricks would. The morning after I pointed out Schwarber's funk (that we now know is a curse), Nick Stellini wrote an article about Schwarber at Fangraphs. Stellini explained what we've just seen. Kyle wasn't making contact like we'd been accustomed to seeing. The two main takeaways from that piece are that Schwarber wasn't pulling the pull as much and that he was hitting the ball on the ground more than he had in 2015. Stellini wasn't privy to the curse, though. Pre-cursed Kyle only hit groundballs 41.0% of the time -- right in line with his 40.4% GB% in 2015. Bad Kyle was hitting groundballs 54.5% of the time. Something happened sometime between May 1 and May 2, though. It's as if Stellini's article expelled the pestilence I'd beset on Schwarber. From the day Stellini wrote that article until now, Schwarber has pulled the ball 46.2% of the time. In 2015, his Pull% was 46.8%. During that same time frame, he's also hit the ball on the ground 38.5% of the time. In 2015, his GB% was 40.4%. Since the pestilence has been eradicated, his average exit velocity is 92.3 mph, a little above his 91.9 mph average exit velocity in 2015. And his average launch angle since May 2 is 18.8°, which is above his average launch angle of 15.5° in 2015. Since May 2, Kyle Schwarber has hit the ball like the 2015 version of Kyle Schwarber. He's hitting it hard. He's pulling it. He's hitting it in the air. His batted-ball profile since that Stellini article is a near-carbon copy of his batted-ball profile from 2015. Even better, he's hitting the ball like this while still maintaining his improved contact skills. Since May 2, his Contact% is 80.0%, which is well above the league-average of 77.5%. He's also showing the improved plate discipline that I previously wrote about Pre-cursed Kyle showing. Since May 2, his O-Swing% is at 24.7%, which is well below his 30.2% O-Swing% in 2015. Post-Stellini-article Schwarber is swinging at more pitches in the zone and fewer out of the zone than 2015 Schwarber. He's making more contact on pitches both in and out of the zone than 2015 Schwarber. Post-Stellini-article Schwarber is walking in 17.1% of his PAs and only striking out in 19.5% of his PAs. And he's hitting the ball like 2015 Schwarber. This version of Schwarber should be a very dangerous hitter. But Post-Stellini-article Schwarber is nothing like 2015 Schwarber. Since May 2, Schwarber is slashing .147/.293/.412. Post-Stellini-article Schwarber is actually Unlucky Kyle -- our third of the Three Faces of Kyle. You see, while Stellini may have vanquished the pestilence I've made Kyle endure, his forces were simply too weak to overcome The Curse. Unlucky Kyle's .265 ISO confirms that he is, indeed, hitting for more power. His .125 BABIP, though, suggests that Unlucky Kyle may forever be condemned to a symbiotic association with my tragic self. Either that or Unlucky Kyle will continue to plug along, and eventually his BABIP will come around, leaving the Cubs with a truly terrifying hitter. If that doesn't pan out, then maybe I should have my lucky friend, Matt, write these articles for me.
  10. I thought it was the best he's looked in 2017. he was getting squeezed quite a lot, but he was hitting his spots with really good movement 15+ swinging strikes in three straight games for him. 15 was his season high last year, which he did three times. He had 20 in his last start, too. I wasn't sure if he was having control/command issues, as I didn't catch much of the game.
  11. How did Lester look today? His velo was way up, back to where he was last year.
  12. And Mekkes: https://streamable.com/gjeim https://streamable.com/btcii https://streamable.com/7i2gp https://streamable.com/8b37h
  13. Here are some Cease videos: https://streamable.com/rx2qz https://streamable.com/1t1xy https://streamable.com/pj2s0 https://streamable.com/aneun https://streamable.com/vn7ta https://streamable.com/xwu0q
  14. Mekkes was really interesting. The stuff isn't great. There was some nice movement. But he was typically 87-88. He hit 91 and 92 also. And his last pitch read 95, but I'm not sure if the gun was just off. The deception was clearly taking a toll on guys, though. He got a ton of whiffs. They obviously weren't picking the ball up at all. I'm not really sure what the deal is, but he was throwing it by everyone. I've got some videos on both that I'll post in a bit.
  15. That's still a pretty exciting lineup for "PANIC! Everyone is sick and hurt!"
  16. I think I've read it's usually around 84 or so, but that's also when he's more 98 than 96. And he was at 82-83 with it, too. But it was mostly at 81. He didn't throw it much. Maybe he just was a little off with it last night. But, yeah, it seems like a big disparity.
  17. Cease opened the game throwing 93-94 to the first batter or two, and then opened it up to 95-96. He came back out in the second and was 93-94 for a couple batters, and then ramped it up again. He was mostly 95-96 the rest of the game, and hit 97 quite a bit, too. I don't think he went any higher than that. For some reason they were able to pile up some hits against him. I'm not sure how; his stuff was incredible. The homer surely was because I was there to ruin him. The same batter that took him deep struck out the following at bat and offered the worst swing I've ever seen from a professional baseball player on strike 3. His control wasn't such a huge problem. He was off some, but just here and there, and usually not by much. He needs to get more economical, though, for sure. He got into a lot of deep counts. And they were able to fight him off some before he finally put them away. His fastball is definitely great, obviously. He has a lot of run on it, too. He struck out several guys with high heat on swings that weren't even close. The terrible swing I previously mentioned was on some high heat. I think the guy was planning on not swinging, and then thought it would be a strike, so he started a swing, way too late on 96, and then realized it wasn't a strike and tried to stop halfway through, as the pitch ran well off the plate. He just didn't stand a chance and looked completely foolish. I was sitting right behind the plate and had a good view of how much run was on his fastball. It was insane. I did wonder if he was throwing two different fastballs or maybe just a weird change or something else. He threw a few pitches at 91-92 throughout the game. And they were low and looked like they had more sink to them. He may have just taken some off. He missed with the fastball some. When he throws the fastball like he wants, it's near unhittable. But he still needs to work on his command of it. The thing that stole the show, to me, was his curve, though. His curve looked incredible. Not only was it a great, big, power curve, but he was commanding it the whole night. He threw it a lot early in the count for strikes. He was nailing it, too. Bringing it just over the inside corner on righties and to the outside corner on lefties. He would bury it when he got to two strikes trying to get batters to chase. But he used it most effectively early in the count to get called strikes. Hitters rarely offered at it. It's just an impossibly difficult pitch. And he had a real great feel for it last night. I didn't like what I saw from the change. It looked a little flat. And he wasn't deceiving hitters with it. They struck it well a couple of times. Maybe it was because I am measuring it up against the fastball and curve and it will do alright since hitters have to key in on those two pitches. But I think it needs a lot of work. There just wasn't the same movement or crispness with it as the other two pitches. His FB, like I said, was mostly 95-96. His curve was around 78. And the change was around 81. The fastball is obviously the big thing with his velo, especially if he pumps it up closer to triple digits as it gets warmer. And it, for sure, is a great pitch. But I really was enamored by his curve. That thing is nasty. And I was kinda shocked by how well he commanded it last night. I was very impressed. He's got two excellent pitches. Hopefully he figures out the change to go with them.
  18. Yeah, I like toasted ravioli, but Sosa's point is spot on. They are basically dive bar food here in Central Illinois -- on par with mini tacos and mozzarella sticks -- and we're not exactly known for our cuisine. For a city to be known for that is a sad, sad thing.
  19. I'm just going to put it out there: Eddie Butler for NLDS Game 1 starter.
×
×
  • Create New...