To me what you have posted there is the biggest cause of the problems when people call someone a "Murton lover" or whatever (not that you are one of them). Murton is not going to be a superstar. He's not going to be great. But what he will do, if past performance is any predictor of future performance, is get on base, hit a few HRs, and hit for good average. These are all things the Cubs need. He might not be better than Floyd, but he probably will be healthier and he's cheap so the Cubs can look to spend money elsewhere. I don't think anyone thinks the Cubs are holding down a potental star, but I think they are making poor decisions. Those poor decisions started way back in the offseason. he would be fine if the team was getting power from more than two spots in the order. If Lee had 18 HR right now, then fine, stick him out there. But people can't say a) we really need more power and b) how dare we don't play Murton in RF you're acting like people are making a choice between murton and griffey or something! the choice is murton or pagan/floyd/jones/some other mediocre RFer who can't hit. of course the cubs should attempt to find someone who can outproduce murton (from a SLG standpoint) if they can. but for now, he's the best option that they control. why not have him in there vs. LHP, at an absolute minimum? Wouldn't you rather have Murton's bat in there against LHP instead of Floyd, Pagan or Fontenot? That's essentially the choice being made here.