Jump to content
North Side Baseball

minnesotacubsfan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    25,057
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by minnesotacubsfan

  1. no, I'm thinking that too Raisin. but there looks like a few decent DT's coming out this year. Hagemen, Nix, Tuitt, Jernigan. Still, the homer in me wants the maroon and gold in blue and orange. That and Hagemen is a athletic freak
  2. and of course, with the NFL moving the game to the 3:00 slot and the Seahawks playing at the same time, I wont get to watch it at home. screw football
  3. Well, this is cool : http://m.espn.go.com/general/story?storyId=10180295&city=chicago&src=desktop
  4. Bass has looked good from time to time, but then just totally disappears. Yea, I was thinking Ratcliff. Melton seems as important as Cutler, not really, but if there is a #2 top priority for the team it's got to be him
  5. Wth happened to Bostic? I expected a lot more from him . Also, draft HAGEMAN. Collins is old, Melton the only real DT. Paea looks lost.
  6. More worried about Lacy then Matthews
  7. [expletive] this guys, you aren't doing this right. [expletive] Rodgers, [expletive] Lacey, [expletive] Matthews. BEAR DOWN BURN [expletive] TO THE GROWN KILL EVERYONE Or just win Chicago
  8. I hope GB rolls the bones on Rodgers collarbone, and Ratcliff destroys Rodgers by literally rolling up Rodgers colletbone. [expletive] GB.
  9. A Lions loss and Packers win would make the result of the Eagles game meaningless (except for potential seeding) I started typing a response to this, and your right it would be meaningless. And really [expletive] weird.
  10. Yup, completely mismanaged and at the top of the league
  11. that sounds like the Seahawks pipe dream for a NFC home playoff game in 2011 IT WORKS GUYS
  12. I think it was weather related
  13. at least this game is ins Chicago Bears 13 Boys 42 blaaaaaah
  14. You could have hired a 3-4 D guy, let 1/2 the defense go in the offseason and we wouldn't be any worse on that side if the ball. Yea, losing 15 d-linemen to injuries hurt, but holy Christ our safeties play out of position a lot Burn it down and start over I still have no idea how the Bears do not have one quality safety on the roster after spending 4 top 4 round picks on safeties and one in the 6th round over the last 6 drafts. (Hardin, Conte, Steltz, Wright, Afalava) That's the thing tho, Conte looked like he was on the rise last year
  15. You could have hired a 3-4 D guy, let 1/2 the defense go in the offseason and we wouldn't be any worse on that side if the ball. Yea, losing 15 d-linemen to injuries hurt, but holy Christ our safeties play out of position a lot Burn it down and start over Is "wouldn't be any worse" really a glowing recommendation of making a switch to the 3-4? Either way you slice it, turnover is needed. 3-4, 4-3, 46, just get the right players in there. Okay maybe we don't want the 46 unless we're facing AP with Ponder at Q, but you get the idea. That being said, Emery has more experience scouting for a 3-4, so if he thinks he would do better finding a fit for that defense, lets go for it. I'm not making an argument for a 3-4, just one against this d coaching staff
  16. Greene and Bostic look to stay, but why is it we only seem to draft good LBs?
  17. You could have hired a 3-4 D guy, let 1/2 the defense go in the offseason and we wouldn't be any worse on that side if the ball. Yea, losing 15 d-linemen to injuries hurt, but holy Christ our safeties play out of position a lot Burn it down and start over
  18. Problem with this analogy: the Giants had a D and ??'s on O. We can't stop anyone The good news is that being good on offense and shaky on defense is better than vice versa. Yea but we look like the [expletive] 2008 Cincinnati Bengals
  19. And somehow, we'll rush Cutty back only to have his liver blown up on the field in the name of sportsmanship
  20. Problem with this analogy: the Giants had a D and ??'s on O. We can't stop anyone
  21. Well, at least the packers still suck
  22. 2nd and 7, let's kick WTF Also, can we finally give up in Mel Tucker? That guy came from one of the NFLs worse D's, and has done so with ours DT injuries be damned
  23. Packers are bad. Life is good.
×
×
  • Create New...