I actually had more or less the same problem, if anyone's interested. It took a few weeks to get this screen-name activated after a few other unsuccessful attempts, not that it really matters. Anyway that gave me an excuse follow in the footsteps of the many brave souls who made their first post in this absolutely epic thread. As for the actual subject matter of this thread (if it can even be said to have a "subject" in the normal sense of the word), I have my doubts. It's been suggested that adding Roberts helps the bench by moving DeRosa too it, but I'm not convinced. The bench w/o Roberts (assuming no other trades) looks like this along w/ the roles each player backs-up: Murton (LF & RF) Ward (1B & RF in a pinch) Fuld (OF) Cedeno (SS, 2B) Blanco © w/ DeRosa @ 3B, RF, LF, and SS when needed. W/ Roberts it looks like this (I'm assuming Payton comes over, and Cedeno is gone) Payton (OF) Ward (1B & RF) DeRosa (IF, LF, and RF) Cintron (SS, since DeRosa really can't) Blanco © If they don't get stuck with Payton, they still have to carry Fuld over Murton or they have no CF back-up for Pie. The latter bench has less Right-handed pinch hitting potential as far as I can tell (I prefer Murton to DeRosa and Payton, whom we might not get anyway), and a lesser back-up at Short (I'll take Cedeno over Cintron). And even without Roberts, DeRosa can still function asa super-sub. Also in the latter case Murton simply doesn't have a job, though he may end up elsewhere regardless. Of course, If he is traded, I suppose I have no case, but still. That said I still think Roberts is enough of an upgrade to make it worth it, but I really don't think it helps the bench at all, at least not without some other trades (like a SS who can move Theriot to the bench... if only...)